Skip to main content

Polarization in State Legislatures



What states are becoming more polarized?
States with more national agendas have more polarized sessions. A national issue means “a state legislative bill that is prominent in the national discourse” (Garlick, 10). And you’re seeing more and more states nowadays having trouble differentiating national concerns from state problems. Most people, if they do watch the news, watch national news channels like Fox or CNN. Constituents pay more attention to national issues because they are simply more focused on in the media. When voters focus their attention on national issues, federal issues start to become local issues. Constituents start to speak up about their new found knowledge of national issues to their state legislators and it adds pressure to members in Congress. It forces them to add national issues to their state political agendas in order to form their party brand. 



Why do people vote along party lines?
People respond to incentives and Congress’ incentive is to get re-elected (Mayhew). Voting along party lines helps secure your chances of re-election. Also, Congress wants influence in the chamber and to leave a legacy (Fenno). Voting with your ideological partners prepares you for a run at higher office. This applies to members in the United States Congress, but especially applies to those at the state level because their sights are always on the White House. If state Senators and state legislators want to get their name on the map, they must enact major legislation and do it to the tune of what the rest of the nation is talking about.
How State Agendas are Nationalized
Two features of national issues: The first is that they gain the support and attention from resource-rich inter groups, which helps aspiring politicians find their footing. Political Action Committees (PACS) can contribute tremendously to campaigns. Kall and Brockman say that if you are a politician, and you do not have a lot of time for meetings, you are more likely to take a meeting with a past donor and talk policy. PACS are always looking at the bigger picture, which means they have bigger than state goals, they are looking nationally. Second, legislators enjoy working on projects that are conspicuous and simple because their constituents are more likely to understand the issue and care about it. 

This definitively shows that there is an association between national policies and party differences when it comes to voting on the floor. Abortion, immigration and guns are the three concerns that I think will never be a non-partisan issue. People feel very strongly towards one of the two sides, so I do not see compromise in the future.
Column 3 displays that when both the political agenda and opinion polarization are used, the political agenda is still significantly correlated to party difference. Column 4 shows that there is undoubtedly a correlation between polarization and national policy and that is shown by the positive numbers for almost every category. If you think about it, the media directs what is on the political agenda, not the other way around. When the media is showing coverage of students fighting for stricter gun control laws, constituents are watching and informing their Congressmen and women to focus on gun control laws. Inevitably, states with more national agendas have more polarized sessions.

Comments

  1. Turner ChangOctober 23, 2019 at 8:25 PM

    I think that those charts greatly add to what you are trying to convey. When looking at the one about polarization on different topics was interesting as those are what are talked about the most in the current news climate.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Ballot Initiative in Colorado

    One of the most distinctive features of the legislative process in Colorado is the prevalence of the ballot initiative. In the election this November, voters had the opportunity to approve their own laws. One of these laws included a proposition that would legalize sports betting.     This is not the first time that voters have had the ability to make hugely influential decisions. Voters have voted to legalize marijuana. In Colorado, they even approve tax increases because of the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, or TABOR. This means that, unlike in other states, Colorado voters have legislative power of their own.      One of these most recent initiatives involved sports betting. Colorado would legalize sports betting, but sports betting would be taxed. This revenue would be used to fund plans to address Colorado's water problem. However, according to the Colorado Sun, the money from sports betting will not generate any money to address these water iss...
Post a Comment
Read more

TABOR & Proposition CC: Providing Context to Colorado's Tax Problem

Edward Baisley Prof. Matthew Hitt POLS 304 Dec. 2019 Blog Post 3 (TABOR and Proposition CC) Colorado's tax system is very unique in comparison to pretty much every other state in the U.S. Arguably the biggest aspect of the tax system that is unique is the amendment to the Colorado Constitution known as TABOR or the Tax Payers Bill of Rights. This amendment which was drafted into law in 1992, has many implications for Colorado's state and local governments. One of the main implications is that TABOR requires the state and local governments of Colorado to acquire voter approval before any tax increase can be implemented. Some other more less known implications are detailed by Denver Post author Anna Staver, she explains that TABOR: “ Limits how many tax dollars governments can keep … It’s called the TABOR cap, anything a government collects above the cap gets returned as a TABOR tax refund … (TABOR) Limits when lawmakers can ask voters to raise taxe...
1 comment
Read more

The Flawed American Electoral System

A free and fair election is one that is inclusive to all of the population. A democratic state requires active citizen participation to ensure equal representation. The framers of the constitution originally wanted the United States government to only be governed by educated white men. It was not until 1920 that the 19th amendment was passed that allowed white females to vote in America. Then it was not until the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that allowed African-Americans the right to vote freely. There were many amendments and reforms throughout history that has changed our election system. Different changes to state election process will ensure an equitable election system. This is a highly debated legislative issue that goes back and forth for the past decade and into the 2020 election. It is crucial for such a powerful and free country to protect its proud democratic values.  There are still issues with the American election systems. There are a lot of holes in represe...
1 comment
Read more