Skip to main content

The Proponents of Proposition DD

Proposition DD and its proponents

One of the most significant and noteworthy results of the recent elections in Colorado was the passing of Proposition DD. A legislative proposition is a proposal placed on the ballot by the state legislature itself. The legislature in Denver referred the measure with House Bill 1327 during the spring season, with easy bipartisan support.[1]

The proposition however did not receive such widespread support from the public, only narrowly passing, and being too close to call on election night. This is illustrated below.
[2]

The passage of Proposition DD legalised gambling on sports events, beginning in six months’ time; making Colorado the nineteenth state to legalise sports betting. Colorado’s seventeen casino operators will be eligible to apply for licenses for both physical and online sportsbooks, with the Colorado Division of Gaming being tasked to regulate the market.[3]

‘Yes on Proposition DD’ raised about $2.83 million for campaigning, issuing a number of commercials to gain support from the public. Proponents were concerned about the wording of the proposal on the ballot. The Proposition DD ballot question read: 

"Shall state taxes be increased by twenty-nine million dollars annually to fund state water projects and commitments and to pay for the regulation of sports betting through licensed casinos by authorizing a tax on sports betting of ten percent of net sports betting proceeds, and to impose the tax on persons licensed to conduct sports betting?".[4]

Some have argued that this wording may have been the reason the vote was so close. However, many opposed the proposition on moral grounds, namely concerns for Coloradoans economic welfare. 

From first glance the supporters of the measure seem an unlikely coalition. Groups involved in the ‘Yes on Proposition DD’ lobbying effort included casinos, agricultural groups, conservative groups and conservationists. This strange coalition was due to the measure’s inclusion of a ten percent tax on casinos net proceeds, the majority of which would be streamed into the Colorado Water Plan. The money would be used to aid the effort to eliminate the 560,000-acre foot gap between supply and demand for water projected for 2050.[5] The state expects to collect up to $29 million from this new tax on sports betting.

The funding for water infrastructure drew the support of a variety of groups, including the Colorado Association of Wheat Growers, Colorado Dairy Farmers, and the Rocky Mountain Farmers Union. Chad Vorthmann, the Executive Vice President for the Colorado Farm Bureau, clearly explained the agricultural communities support of the Proposition when he stated: “most farmers and ranchers could care less about sport betting. But this is a smart way to pay for the critical water infrastructure that Colorado’s future needs”.[6]

Much of the advertising campaigns focused on the benefits the extra funding would give. Prop DD proponents took a cue from Great Outdoors Colorado, the 1992 ballot initiative that redirected lottery revenue collected by the state toward Colorado’s park and open space.[7] However, most of the commercials were funded by the gaming industry. In fact, 97.5% of the money donated in the first eleven days of September were from the gaming industry, despite the almost exclusive focus on the effects on water for the state.[8] For example, FanDuel, a sports betting app contributed $250,000. In contrast, only $10,000 came from water industry stakeholders, including the Environmental Defence Fund’s advocacy arm. 

Conservative groups, such as the CCA, supported the proposition on the grounds that the taxation of gambling was preferable to an increase of the taxation of citizens. In addition, the proposition allowed for the regulation of an already existent but ‘underground’ market within the state.[9] Both Democrats and Republican representatives hailed the legalisation of sports betting as a common-sense approach.


[1] Joey Bunch, ‘Agriculture groups endorse Colorado ballot measure on sports betting’, Colorado Politics, (Oct 2019), online at: https://www.coloradopolitics.com/news/agriculture-groups-endorse-colorado-ballot-measure-on-sports-betting/article_9e877fdc-e458-11e9-ad7e-f7873247746a.html
[2] Robert Tann, ‘2019 City of Boulder live election results’, CU Independent, Online at: https://cuindependent.com/2019/11/05/2019-city-of-boulder-live-election-results/, (Nov 2019)
[3] Saja Hindi, ‘Colorado Prop DD, the Sports Betting Measure Narrowly Passes’, Denver Post, (Nov 2019), online at: https://www.denverpost.com/2019/11/06/colorado-proposition-dd-results-sports-betting/
[4] Conor McCormick-Cavanagh, ‘First Prop DD Ads Focus on Water, but financed by gaming industry’, WestWorld, (Sept 2019), online at: https://www.westword.com/news/denver-streets-and-snow-removal-remain-a-hot-topic-11558622

[5] Jacy Marmaduke, ‘Proposition DD: legalised sports betting in Colorado passes with 1.4% margin’, Fort Collins Coloradoan, (Nov 2019), online at: https://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2019/11/05/colorado-election-results-2019-proposition-dd/4166709002/
[6] J. Bunch, ‘Agriculture groups endorse Colorado ballot measure on sports betting’, Colorado Politics, (Oct 2019), online at: https://www.coloradopolitics.com/news/agriculture-groups-endorse-colorado-ballot-measure-on-sports-betting/article_9e877fdc-e458-11e9-ad7e-f7873247746a.html
[7] C. McCormick-Cavanagh, ‘First Prop DD Ads Focus on Water, but financed by gaming industry’, WestWorld, (Sept 2019), online at: https://www.westword.com/news/denver-streets-and-snow-removal-remain-a-hot-topic-11558622
[8] Ibid.
[9] S. Hindi, ‘Colorado Prop DD, the Sports Betting Measure Narrowly Passes’, Denver Post, (Nov 2019), online at: https://www.denverpost.com/2019/11/06/colorado-proposition-dd-results-sports-betting/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Insulin cap in Colorado

In the United States, the topic of medication prices has increased substantially, specifically insulin. Insulin is a medication used to treat type one Diabetes which typically costs a thousand dollars or more depending on how much you need, and how much your insurance is willing to pay. Colorado changed this with a bill designed to put a cap on the copay for insulin. The bill HB19-1216 was signed into law by Governor Jared Polis in May of 2019. This bill states that “a carrier that provides coverage for prescription insulin drugs pursuant to the terms of a health coverage plan the carrier offers shall cap the total amount that a covered person is required to pay for a covered prescription insulin drug at an amount not to exceed one hundred dollars per thirty-day supply of insulin, regardless of the amount of type of insulin needed to fill the covered person’s prescription.” This bill will go into effect on January 1st, 2020 and will be overseen by the department of law who will investi...
7 comments
Read more

TABOR and Colorado Politics Post-CC

       One of the more contentious topics within Colorado politics is budgeting and funding for projects, education, and revenue intake. This came to a head in this year's election with Proposition CC. Despite failing at the ballot box, the Democratic Party is pushing ahead with the 2020 legislative agenda that includes drafts to eliminate the Tax Payer's Bill of Rights or amend it to ensure more accessible revenue for the party's policy objectives. What is critical to the debate is the increasing partisan divide within Colorado, the historical shift from Republican control to Democrat trifectas in state government, and the institutional mechanisms that have hampered strategy for the dominant party. Also, in the mix are interest groups that influence local politics which can help uncover party strategy from another perspective.        The Colorado Fiscal Institute (CFI) a left-leaning think tank, is a key player in this battle, authoring s everal...
6 comments
Read more

Gun Control in Colorado

Due to the prevalence of mass shootings in the United States, many states have adapted gun legislation to target the issue. Colorado is no exception. The House Bill 1177 or more commonly known as “the red flag bill” was passed this previous legislative session (Aguilar). The bill allows the court to seize firearms from individuals who are deemed a threat to themselves or to others (Aguilar). This considerable gun legislation is significant for Democrats who have advocated for gun control for years. More importantly, the passing of this bill may once again demonstrate which party has been gaining momentum in Colorado these past few years. Colorado’s legislature has generally sided to the left in recent times (Strayer 141). This is a significant shift from the more Republican leaning legislature that Colorado was previously used to (Strayer 141). Furthermore, Colorado’s House Bill 1177 is in no way addressing the issue in a very unique way. Figure 1 below demonstrates nationwide...
6 comments
Read more