Skip to main content

The Proponents of Proposition DD

Proposition DD and its proponents

One of the most significant and noteworthy results of the recent elections in Colorado was the passing of Proposition DD. A legislative proposition is a proposal placed on the ballot by the state legislature itself. The legislature in Denver referred the measure with House Bill 1327 during the spring season, with easy bipartisan support.[1]

The proposition however did not receive such widespread support from the public, only narrowly passing, and being too close to call on election night. This is illustrated below.
[2]

The passage of Proposition DD legalised gambling on sports events, beginning in six months’ time; making Colorado the nineteenth state to legalise sports betting. Colorado’s seventeen casino operators will be eligible to apply for licenses for both physical and online sportsbooks, with the Colorado Division of Gaming being tasked to regulate the market.[3]

‘Yes on Proposition DD’ raised about $2.83 million for campaigning, issuing a number of commercials to gain support from the public. Proponents were concerned about the wording of the proposal on the ballot. The Proposition DD ballot question read: 

"Shall state taxes be increased by twenty-nine million dollars annually to fund state water projects and commitments and to pay for the regulation of sports betting through licensed casinos by authorizing a tax on sports betting of ten percent of net sports betting proceeds, and to impose the tax on persons licensed to conduct sports betting?".[4]

Some have argued that this wording may have been the reason the vote was so close. However, many opposed the proposition on moral grounds, namely concerns for Coloradoans economic welfare. 

From first glance the supporters of the measure seem an unlikely coalition. Groups involved in the ‘Yes on Proposition DD’ lobbying effort included casinos, agricultural groups, conservative groups and conservationists. This strange coalition was due to the measure’s inclusion of a ten percent tax on casinos net proceeds, the majority of which would be streamed into the Colorado Water Plan. The money would be used to aid the effort to eliminate the 560,000-acre foot gap between supply and demand for water projected for 2050.[5] The state expects to collect up to $29 million from this new tax on sports betting.

The funding for water infrastructure drew the support of a variety of groups, including the Colorado Association of Wheat Growers, Colorado Dairy Farmers, and the Rocky Mountain Farmers Union. Chad Vorthmann, the Executive Vice President for the Colorado Farm Bureau, clearly explained the agricultural communities support of the Proposition when he stated: “most farmers and ranchers could care less about sport betting. But this is a smart way to pay for the critical water infrastructure that Colorado’s future needs”.[6]

Much of the advertising campaigns focused on the benefits the extra funding would give. Prop DD proponents took a cue from Great Outdoors Colorado, the 1992 ballot initiative that redirected lottery revenue collected by the state toward Colorado’s park and open space.[7] However, most of the commercials were funded by the gaming industry. In fact, 97.5% of the money donated in the first eleven days of September were from the gaming industry, despite the almost exclusive focus on the effects on water for the state.[8] For example, FanDuel, a sports betting app contributed $250,000. In contrast, only $10,000 came from water industry stakeholders, including the Environmental Defence Fund’s advocacy arm. 

Conservative groups, such as the CCA, supported the proposition on the grounds that the taxation of gambling was preferable to an increase of the taxation of citizens. In addition, the proposition allowed for the regulation of an already existent but ‘underground’ market within the state.[9] Both Democrats and Republican representatives hailed the legalisation of sports betting as a common-sense approach.


[1] Joey Bunch, ‘Agriculture groups endorse Colorado ballot measure on sports betting’, Colorado Politics, (Oct 2019), online at: https://www.coloradopolitics.com/news/agriculture-groups-endorse-colorado-ballot-measure-on-sports-betting/article_9e877fdc-e458-11e9-ad7e-f7873247746a.html
[2] Robert Tann, ‘2019 City of Boulder live election results’, CU Independent, Online at: https://cuindependent.com/2019/11/05/2019-city-of-boulder-live-election-results/, (Nov 2019)
[3] Saja Hindi, ‘Colorado Prop DD, the Sports Betting Measure Narrowly Passes’, Denver Post, (Nov 2019), online at: https://www.denverpost.com/2019/11/06/colorado-proposition-dd-results-sports-betting/
[4] Conor McCormick-Cavanagh, ‘First Prop DD Ads Focus on Water, but financed by gaming industry’, WestWorld, (Sept 2019), online at: https://www.westword.com/news/denver-streets-and-snow-removal-remain-a-hot-topic-11558622

[5] Jacy Marmaduke, ‘Proposition DD: legalised sports betting in Colorado passes with 1.4% margin’, Fort Collins Coloradoan, (Nov 2019), online at: https://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2019/11/05/colorado-election-results-2019-proposition-dd/4166709002/
[6] J. Bunch, ‘Agriculture groups endorse Colorado ballot measure on sports betting’, Colorado Politics, (Oct 2019), online at: https://www.coloradopolitics.com/news/agriculture-groups-endorse-colorado-ballot-measure-on-sports-betting/article_9e877fdc-e458-11e9-ad7e-f7873247746a.html
[7] C. McCormick-Cavanagh, ‘First Prop DD Ads Focus on Water, but financed by gaming industry’, WestWorld, (Sept 2019), online at: https://www.westword.com/news/denver-streets-and-snow-removal-remain-a-hot-topic-11558622
[8] Ibid.
[9] S. Hindi, ‘Colorado Prop DD, the Sports Betting Measure Narrowly Passes’, Denver Post, (Nov 2019), online at: https://www.denverpost.com/2019/11/06/colorado-proposition-dd-results-sports-betting/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

TABOR & Proposition CC: Providing Context to Colorado's Tax Problem

Edward Baisley Prof. Matthew Hitt POLS 304 Dec. 2019 Blog Post 3 (TABOR and Proposition CC) Colorado's tax system is very unique in comparison to pretty much every other state in the U.S. Arguably the biggest aspect of the tax system that is unique is the amendment to the Colorado Constitution known as TABOR or the Tax Payers Bill of Rights. This amendment which was drafted into law in 1992, has many implications for Colorado's state and local governments. One of the main implications is that TABOR requires the state and local governments of Colorado to acquire voter approval before any tax increase can be implemented. Some other more less known implications are detailed by Denver Post author Anna Staver, she explains that TABOR: “ Limits how many tax dollars governments can keep … It’s called the TABOR cap, anything a government collects above the cap gets returned as a TABOR tax refund … (TABOR) Limits when lawmakers can ask voters to raise taxe...
1 comment
Read more

The Flawed American Electoral System

A free and fair election is one that is inclusive to all of the population. A democratic state requires active citizen participation to ensure equal representation. The framers of the constitution originally wanted the United States government to only be governed by educated white men. It was not until 1920 that the 19th amendment was passed that allowed white females to vote in America. Then it was not until the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that allowed African-Americans the right to vote freely. There were many amendments and reforms throughout history that has changed our election system. Different changes to state election process will ensure an equitable election system. This is a highly debated legislative issue that goes back and forth for the past decade and into the 2020 election. It is crucial for such a powerful and free country to protect its proud democratic values.  There are still issues with the American election systems. There are a lot of holes in represe...
1 comment
Read more

The Ballot Initiative in Colorado

    One of the most distinctive features of the legislative process in Colorado is the prevalence of the ballot initiative. In the election this November, voters had the opportunity to approve their own laws. One of these laws included a proposition that would legalize sports betting.     This is not the first time that voters have had the ability to make hugely influential decisions. Voters have voted to legalize marijuana. In Colorado, they even approve tax increases because of the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, or TABOR. This means that, unlike in other states, Colorado voters have legislative power of their own.      One of these most recent initiatives involved sports betting. Colorado would legalize sports betting, but sports betting would be taxed. This revenue would be used to fund plans to address Colorado's water problem. However, according to the Colorado Sun, the money from sports betting will not generate any money to address these water iss...
Post a Comment
Read more