Skip to main content

Bipartisanship, Climate Change, and Representation


Bipartisanship, Climate Change, and Representation
            Today’s political climate is seemingly quite hopeless. The polarization of the two parties within politics and specifically within Congress proves time and time again to be a dividing factor for Americans, politicians, and constituents. One of the most polarizing topics of today is the topic of climate change. With the recent climate strikes popping up globally and nationally many people have voiced their opinions on whether or not they agree with the subject of climate change. President Trump voiced is opinion tweeting, “The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive” (Twitter.com/realdonaldtrump). Whereas climate activists such as Greta Thunberg has said, “…if you really understood the situation and still kept on failing to act, then you would be evil and that I refuse to believe” (bbc.co.uk).
            How do politicians react to this and how does this correlate with their constituency? President Trump’s said tweet, he feels that the issue of climate change is a farce, even though in New York on the day of the September climate strike, 1.1 million students were excused from class in order to participate in climate strikes (USA Today). One explanation can be found in Fenno’s Concentric Circles. According to Adler, E. Scott, Jeffrey A. Jenkins, and Charles R. Shipan, the Fenno Concentric Circle says that Politician’s first concern is their inner circle and then their primary constituency, their reelection constituency, and then their geographic constituency (Adler, Jenkins et. al).

Young demonstrators join the International Youth Climate Strike event at the Capitol in Washington, D.C., on March 15, 2019. (J. Scott Applewhite/AP)
Figure 1: Climate Change Activists during 2019 Climate Strike, Washington DC. https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2019/03/15/school-climate-change-strike
            This offers the perspective that Trump considers the wants and needs of his inner circle constituency and his primary constituency first who don’t necessarily support the notion of climate change. There are, however, some legislature that seemingly both political parties that concern the environment and outdoor activity, this being the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF). According to a podcast by the Dirtbag Diaries, the LWCF acquires $40 billion from oil and gas royalties from offshore oil production to purchase and maintain land for public recreation and this is a rare case that many politicians from both parties agree on (Dirtbag Diaries). Although this is something that both parties agree to be a fiscally “good” thing, there are still critics for the practice. According to an article from Offshore Technology, “…[to] many critics, however, it presents a totally unacceptable risk to the environment and human health, whether from air pollution, groundwater contamination or even induced seismicity” and continue, " The debate over fracking has polarised opinion, with governmental approval of fracking operations provoking protests in the US.."(Offshore Technology). This polarization of the offshore fracking comes from, primarily democratic, constituencies, yet the LWCF, that appropriates royalties from offshore fracking, gets the support from democrat representatives and republicans alike. This again points to Fenno's concentric circle, and possibly these representatives have others, besides their district and geographical constituency, in mind. 
Many different committee heads from both the democratic and republican parties have expressed their support and even amend different bills that are introduced in order for their parties to gain profit from the LWCF bill. Though there are still critics that are constituents from both parties. The legislature is a tricky and tedious process and as Fenno explains in his Concentric Circle that many representatives are more concerned with the needs and wants for those who are closest to them or provide more resources and support, which may leave a majority of their geographic constituents unhappy.
Women congress
Figure 2 Fenno's Concentric Circle; slideshare.net








Work Cited
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
“Frac Pack: The Offshore Fracking Debate Heats Up.” 2014. Offshore Technology | Oil and Gas News and Market Analysis. https://www.offshore-technology.com/features/featurefrac-pack-the-offshore-fracking-debate-heats-up-4421500/ (October 17, 2019).
“From India To Kentucky, Students Around The World Walk Out To Demand Climate Change Action.” https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2019/03/15/school-climate-change-strike (October 17, 2019).
“Greta Thunberg: Climate Change Activist’s ‘How Dare You’ Message to World Leaders - CBBC Newsround.” https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/49801041 (October 17, 2019).
“The Land and Water Conservation Fund.” 2019. The Dirtbag Diaries. https://dirtbagdiaries.com/the-land-and-water-conservation-fund/ (October 17, 2019).
Trump, Donald J. 2012. “The Concept of Global Warming Was Created by and for the Chinese in Order to Make U.S. Manufacturing Non-Competitive.” @realDonaldTrump. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/265895292191248385 (October 17, 2019).


Comments

  1. Bridget MurphyOctober 18, 2019 at 1:32 PM

    I think you do a nice job applying rhetoric around climate change to political motivations and the different types of constituents that politicians cater to. I too found the Dirtbag Diaries podcast interesting and somewhat unbelievable how many obstacles the lobbyists faced when it was one of the most bipartisan-supported pieces of legislation in Washington. Your article makes me wonder if the President really does believe that climate change was a concept invented by China, or if he knows that it’s real but that kind of language wins him political points with his base.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mary LeonardOctober 22, 2019 at 1:16 PM

    Great piece! It is interesting to look at how the polarization in Congress affects specific issues, especially global issues like climate change. It seems to be an issue that constituents are most worried about the opinions of those closest to them. I think this is why polarization may be such a problem in Congress; constituents aren’t necessarily expressing what they truly believe. There maybe would be much more agreement on climate change policies if legislators weren’t so worried about the Concentric Circle you mentioned.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Eddy BaisleyOctober 22, 2019 at 1:36 PM

    Thank you for your post about the relationship between Bipartisanship, Climate Change, and Representation. I think you did an excellent job applying some of readings in class to your argument which made for a great conclusion. The section I particularly liked and agreed with was your section on representation and how politicians first worry about their inner circle etc. The Trump tweet is an excellent of how a politician uses certain political stances, for instance the denial of climate change, to pander to certain demographics of people in order to garner votes from his base constituency.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gun Control in Colorado

Due to the prevalence of mass shootings in the United States, many states have adapted gun legislation to target the issue. Colorado is no exception. The House Bill 1177 or more commonly known as “the red flag bill” was passed this previous legislative session (Aguilar). The bill allows the court to seize firearms from individuals who are deemed a threat to themselves or to others (Aguilar). This considerable gun legislation is significant for Democrats who have advocated for gun control for years. More importantly, the passing of this bill may once again demonstrate which party has been gaining momentum in Colorado these past few years. Colorado’s legislature has generally sided to the left in recent times (Strayer 141). This is a significant shift from the more Republican leaning legislature that Colorado was previously used to (Strayer 141). Furthermore, Colorado’s House Bill 1177 is in no way addressing the issue in a very unique way. Figure 1 below demonstrates nationwide...
6 comments
Read more

Insulin cap in Colorado

In the United States, the topic of medication prices has increased substantially, specifically insulin. Insulin is a medication used to treat type one Diabetes which typically costs a thousand dollars or more depending on how much you need, and how much your insurance is willing to pay. Colorado changed this with a bill designed to put a cap on the copay for insulin. The bill HB19-1216 was signed into law by Governor Jared Polis in May of 2019. This bill states that “a carrier that provides coverage for prescription insulin drugs pursuant to the terms of a health coverage plan the carrier offers shall cap the total amount that a covered person is required to pay for a covered prescription insulin drug at an amount not to exceed one hundred dollars per thirty-day supply of insulin, regardless of the amount of type of insulin needed to fill the covered person’s prescription.” This bill will go into effect on January 1st, 2020 and will be overseen by the department of law who will investi...
7 comments
Read more

TABOR and Colorado Politics Post-CC

       One of the more contentious topics within Colorado politics is budgeting and funding for projects, education, and revenue intake. This came to a head in this year's election with Proposition CC. Despite failing at the ballot box, the Democratic Party is pushing ahead with the 2020 legislative agenda that includes drafts to eliminate the Tax Payer's Bill of Rights or amend it to ensure more accessible revenue for the party's policy objectives. What is critical to the debate is the increasing partisan divide within Colorado, the historical shift from Republican control to Democrat trifectas in state government, and the institutional mechanisms that have hampered strategy for the dominant party. Also, in the mix are interest groups that influence local politics which can help uncover party strategy from another perspective.        The Colorado Fiscal Institute (CFI) a left-leaning think tank, is a key player in this battle, authoring s everal...
6 comments
Read more