Skip to main content

Bipartisanship, Climate Change, and Representation


Bipartisanship, Climate Change, and Representation
            Today’s political climate is seemingly quite hopeless. The polarization of the two parties within politics and specifically within Congress proves time and time again to be a dividing factor for Americans, politicians, and constituents. One of the most polarizing topics of today is the topic of climate change. With the recent climate strikes popping up globally and nationally many people have voiced their opinions on whether or not they agree with the subject of climate change. President Trump voiced is opinion tweeting, “The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive” (Twitter.com/realdonaldtrump). Whereas climate activists such as Greta Thunberg has said, “…if you really understood the situation and still kept on failing to act, then you would be evil and that I refuse to believe” (bbc.co.uk).
            How do politicians react to this and how does this correlate with their constituency? President Trump’s said tweet, he feels that the issue of climate change is a farce, even though in New York on the day of the September climate strike, 1.1 million students were excused from class in order to participate in climate strikes (USA Today). One explanation can be found in Fenno’s Concentric Circles. According to Adler, E. Scott, Jeffrey A. Jenkins, and Charles R. Shipan, the Fenno Concentric Circle says that Politician’s first concern is their inner circle and then their primary constituency, their reelection constituency, and then their geographic constituency (Adler, Jenkins et. al).

Young demonstrators join the International Youth Climate Strike event at the Capitol in Washington, D.C., on March 15, 2019. (J. Scott Applewhite/AP)
Figure 1: Climate Change Activists during 2019 Climate Strike, Washington DC. https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2019/03/15/school-climate-change-strike
            This offers the perspective that Trump considers the wants and needs of his inner circle constituency and his primary constituency first who don’t necessarily support the notion of climate change. There are, however, some legislature that seemingly both political parties that concern the environment and outdoor activity, this being the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF). According to a podcast by the Dirtbag Diaries, the LWCF acquires $40 billion from oil and gas royalties from offshore oil production to purchase and maintain land for public recreation and this is a rare case that many politicians from both parties agree on (Dirtbag Diaries). Although this is something that both parties agree to be a fiscally “good” thing, there are still critics for the practice. According to an article from Offshore Technology, “…[to] many critics, however, it presents a totally unacceptable risk to the environment and human health, whether from air pollution, groundwater contamination or even induced seismicity” and continue, " The debate over fracking has polarised opinion, with governmental approval of fracking operations provoking protests in the US.."(Offshore Technology). This polarization of the offshore fracking comes from, primarily democratic, constituencies, yet the LWCF, that appropriates royalties from offshore fracking, gets the support from democrat representatives and republicans alike. This again points to Fenno's concentric circle, and possibly these representatives have others, besides their district and geographical constituency, in mind. 
Many different committee heads from both the democratic and republican parties have expressed their support and even amend different bills that are introduced in order for their parties to gain profit from the LWCF bill. Though there are still critics that are constituents from both parties. The legislature is a tricky and tedious process and as Fenno explains in his Concentric Circle that many representatives are more concerned with the needs and wants for those who are closest to them or provide more resources and support, which may leave a majority of their geographic constituents unhappy.
Women congress
Figure 2 Fenno's Concentric Circle; slideshare.net








Work Cited
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
“Frac Pack: The Offshore Fracking Debate Heats Up.” 2014. Offshore Technology | Oil and Gas News and Market Analysis. https://www.offshore-technology.com/features/featurefrac-pack-the-offshore-fracking-debate-heats-up-4421500/ (October 17, 2019).
“From India To Kentucky, Students Around The World Walk Out To Demand Climate Change Action.” https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2019/03/15/school-climate-change-strike (October 17, 2019).
“Greta Thunberg: Climate Change Activist’s ‘How Dare You’ Message to World Leaders - CBBC Newsround.” https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/49801041 (October 17, 2019).
“The Land and Water Conservation Fund.” 2019. The Dirtbag Diaries. https://dirtbagdiaries.com/the-land-and-water-conservation-fund/ (October 17, 2019).
Trump, Donald J. 2012. “The Concept of Global Warming Was Created by and for the Chinese in Order to Make U.S. Manufacturing Non-Competitive.” @realDonaldTrump. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/265895292191248385 (October 17, 2019).


Comments

  1. Bridget MurphyOctober 18, 2019 at 1:32 PM

    I think you do a nice job applying rhetoric around climate change to political motivations and the different types of constituents that politicians cater to. I too found the Dirtbag Diaries podcast interesting and somewhat unbelievable how many obstacles the lobbyists faced when it was one of the most bipartisan-supported pieces of legislation in Washington. Your article makes me wonder if the President really does believe that climate change was a concept invented by China, or if he knows that it’s real but that kind of language wins him political points with his base.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mary LeonardOctober 22, 2019 at 1:16 PM

    Great piece! It is interesting to look at how the polarization in Congress affects specific issues, especially global issues like climate change. It seems to be an issue that constituents are most worried about the opinions of those closest to them. I think this is why polarization may be such a problem in Congress; constituents aren’t necessarily expressing what they truly believe. There maybe would be much more agreement on climate change policies if legislators weren’t so worried about the Concentric Circle you mentioned.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Eddy BaisleyOctober 22, 2019 at 1:36 PM

    Thank you for your post about the relationship between Bipartisanship, Climate Change, and Representation. I think you did an excellent job applying some of readings in class to your argument which made for a great conclusion. The section I particularly liked and agreed with was your section on representation and how politicians first worry about their inner circle etc. The Trump tweet is an excellent of how a politician uses certain political stances, for instance the denial of climate change, to pander to certain demographics of people in order to garner votes from his base constituency.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

TABOR & Proposition CC: Providing Context to Colorado's Tax Problem

Edward Baisley Prof. Matthew Hitt POLS 304 Dec. 2019 Blog Post 3 (TABOR and Proposition CC) Colorado's tax system is very unique in comparison to pretty much every other state in the U.S. Arguably the biggest aspect of the tax system that is unique is the amendment to the Colorado Constitution known as TABOR or the Tax Payers Bill of Rights. This amendment which was drafted into law in 1992, has many implications for Colorado's state and local governments. One of the main implications is that TABOR requires the state and local governments of Colorado to acquire voter approval before any tax increase can be implemented. Some other more less known implications are detailed by Denver Post author Anna Staver, she explains that TABOR: “ Limits how many tax dollars governments can keep … It’s called the TABOR cap, anything a government collects above the cap gets returned as a TABOR tax refund … (TABOR) Limits when lawmakers can ask voters to raise taxe...
1 comment
Read more

The Flawed American Electoral System

A free and fair election is one that is inclusive to all of the population. A democratic state requires active citizen participation to ensure equal representation. The framers of the constitution originally wanted the United States government to only be governed by educated white men. It was not until 1920 that the 19th amendment was passed that allowed white females to vote in America. Then it was not until the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that allowed African-Americans the right to vote freely. There were many amendments and reforms throughout history that has changed our election system. Different changes to state election process will ensure an equitable election system. This is a highly debated legislative issue that goes back and forth for the past decade and into the 2020 election. It is crucial for such a powerful and free country to protect its proud democratic values.  There are still issues with the American election systems. There are a lot of holes in represe...
1 comment
Read more

The Ballot Initiative in Colorado

    One of the most distinctive features of the legislative process in Colorado is the prevalence of the ballot initiative. In the election this November, voters had the opportunity to approve their own laws. One of these laws included a proposition that would legalize sports betting.     This is not the first time that voters have had the ability to make hugely influential decisions. Voters have voted to legalize marijuana. In Colorado, they even approve tax increases because of the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, or TABOR. This means that, unlike in other states, Colorado voters have legislative power of their own.      One of these most recent initiatives involved sports betting. Colorado would legalize sports betting, but sports betting would be taxed. This revenue would be used to fund plans to address Colorado's water problem. However, according to the Colorado Sun, the money from sports betting will not generate any money to address these water iss...
Post a Comment
Read more