Skip to main content

Separation of Powers and Political Incentives

The topic of separation of powers has become a bigger issue in recent years due to Trump’s administration. Besides a majority of Democrats in both the House and Senate opposing Trump’s administration, the Judiciary Committee, however, has taken more of an interest in impeaching Trump. This may impede the Legislative branch’s ability to vote on that type of situation. As it is the Legislative branch's job to make laws and impeach federal officials, it makes House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler’s speech that much more interesting. Nadler expresses the opinion of the Judiciary Committee’s panel by stating, "Frankly, we are concentrating our resources on determining whether to impeach the president. Personally, I think the President ought to be impeached but we have to concentrate on that for the next few months." This is concerning questions of the sexual assault allegations made against Brett Kavanaugh in October during his confirmation to the Supreme Court. Recently a new corroboration has come to the forefront as New York Times reporters find that Kavanaugh exposed himself to a fellow classmate. Although this allegation has not been verified and has sparked this new investigation against him. In either case, this is deemed a Legislative Branch’s issue since it is the only branch authorized to make the final decision on it as stated in the constitution. The only way this can become a Judicial issue is if any part of the investigation is found to be unconstitutional in the process of gathering information for the impeachment, not the ‘trial’ of impeachment, itself. Anything else would be a violation of the separation of powers as stated previously. Specifically legislative interference, in which a branch of government impedes another branch’s power. Regarding this topic, most members of congress agree with wanting Kavanaugh off the Supreme Court, but not for the reasons people may think. Bernie Sanders, along with democrats Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris have also called to have an investigation into the accusations against Kavanaugh. However, they do not have the feelings of the public in mind, or in other terms a trustee approach to the situation. Sanders, Warren, and Kamala only express this much interest due to being presidential candidates. Trying to appeal to the public for their own political gain which results in an increase in approval ratings, which gives them more incentive to please the public than speak on ideals that are best for citizens. As all political scientists know, people are more likely to respond to incentives than anything else. It is essentially about picking the right groups to appeal to receive more traction in any type of election. Sanders, Warren, and Kamala are appealing to other democrats and women who have experienced sexual assault. Although Kavanaugh’s impeachment would play a factor in important judicial decisions, it doesn’t help the citizen’s expressed issues. The main issues the American people are more focused on currently are healthcare, education, gun control, etc. These issues are to be resolved by the legislative branch so, drawing unnecessary attention to the Judicial branch will provide no beneficial opinions of public policy. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

TABOR & Proposition CC: Providing Context to Colorado's Tax Problem

Edward Baisley Prof. Matthew Hitt POLS 304 Dec. 2019 Blog Post 3 (TABOR and Proposition CC) Colorado's tax system is very unique in comparison to pretty much every other state in the U.S. Arguably the biggest aspect of the tax system that is unique is the amendment to the Colorado Constitution known as TABOR or the Tax Payers Bill of Rights. This amendment which was drafted into law in 1992, has many implications for Colorado's state and local governments. One of the main implications is that TABOR requires the state and local governments of Colorado to acquire voter approval before any tax increase can be implemented. Some other more less known implications are detailed by Denver Post author Anna Staver, she explains that TABOR: “ Limits how many tax dollars governments can keep … It’s called the TABOR cap, anything a government collects above the cap gets returned as a TABOR tax refund … (TABOR) Limits when lawmakers can ask voters to raise taxe...

The Flawed American Electoral System

A free and fair election is one that is inclusive to all of the population. A democratic state requires active citizen participation to ensure equal representation. The framers of the constitution originally wanted the United States government to only be governed by educated white men. It was not until 1920 that the 19th amendment was passed that allowed white females to vote in America. Then it was not until the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that allowed African-Americans the right to vote freely. There were many amendments and reforms throughout history that has changed our election system. Different changes to state election process will ensure an equitable election system. This is a highly debated legislative issue that goes back and forth for the past decade and into the 2020 election. It is crucial for such a powerful and free country to protect its proud democratic values.  There are still issues with the American election systems. There are a lot of holes in represe...

The Ballot Initiative in Colorado

    One of the most distinctive features of the legislative process in Colorado is the prevalence of the ballot initiative. In the election this November, voters had the opportunity to approve their own laws. One of these laws included a proposition that would legalize sports betting.     This is not the first time that voters have had the ability to make hugely influential decisions. Voters have voted to legalize marijuana. In Colorado, they even approve tax increases because of the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, or TABOR. This means that, unlike in other states, Colorado voters have legislative power of their own.      One of these most recent initiatives involved sports betting. Colorado would legalize sports betting, but sports betting would be taxed. This revenue would be used to fund plans to address Colorado's water problem. However, according to the Colorado Sun, the money from sports betting will not generate any money to address these water iss...