Skip to main content

Separation of Powers and Political Incentives

The topic of separation of powers has become a bigger issue in recent years due to Trump’s administration. Besides a majority of Democrats in both the House and Senate opposing Trump’s administration, the Judiciary Committee, however, has taken more of an interest in impeaching Trump. This may impede the Legislative branch’s ability to vote on that type of situation. As it is the Legislative branch's job to make laws and impeach federal officials, it makes House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler’s speech that much more interesting. Nadler expresses the opinion of the Judiciary Committee’s panel by stating, "Frankly, we are concentrating our resources on determining whether to impeach the president. Personally, I think the President ought to be impeached but we have to concentrate on that for the next few months." This is concerning questions of the sexual assault allegations made against Brett Kavanaugh in October during his confirmation to the Supreme Court. Recently a new corroboration has come to the forefront as New York Times reporters find that Kavanaugh exposed himself to a fellow classmate. Although this allegation has not been verified and has sparked this new investigation against him. In either case, this is deemed a Legislative Branch’s issue since it is the only branch authorized to make the final decision on it as stated in the constitution. The only way this can become a Judicial issue is if any part of the investigation is found to be unconstitutional in the process of gathering information for the impeachment, not the ‘trial’ of impeachment, itself. Anything else would be a violation of the separation of powers as stated previously. Specifically legislative interference, in which a branch of government impedes another branch’s power. Regarding this topic, most members of congress agree with wanting Kavanaugh off the Supreme Court, but not for the reasons people may think. Bernie Sanders, along with democrats Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris have also called to have an investigation into the accusations against Kavanaugh. However, they do not have the feelings of the public in mind, or in other terms a trustee approach to the situation. Sanders, Warren, and Kamala only express this much interest due to being presidential candidates. Trying to appeal to the public for their own political gain which results in an increase in approval ratings, which gives them more incentive to please the public than speak on ideals that are best for citizens. As all political scientists know, people are more likely to respond to incentives than anything else. It is essentially about picking the right groups to appeal to receive more traction in any type of election. Sanders, Warren, and Kamala are appealing to other democrats and women who have experienced sexual assault. Although Kavanaugh’s impeachment would play a factor in important judicial decisions, it doesn’t help the citizen’s expressed issues. The main issues the American people are more focused on currently are healthcare, education, gun control, etc. These issues are to be resolved by the legislative branch so, drawing unnecessary attention to the Judicial branch will provide no beneficial opinions of public policy. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gun Control in Colorado

Due to the prevalence of mass shootings in the United States, many states have adapted gun legislation to target the issue. Colorado is no exception. The House Bill 1177 or more commonly known as “the red flag bill” was passed this previous legislative session (Aguilar). The bill allows the court to seize firearms from individuals who are deemed a threat to themselves or to others (Aguilar). This considerable gun legislation is significant for Democrats who have advocated for gun control for years. More importantly, the passing of this bill may once again demonstrate which party has been gaining momentum in Colorado these past few years. Colorado’s legislature has generally sided to the left in recent times (Strayer 141). This is a significant shift from the more Republican leaning legislature that Colorado was previously used to (Strayer 141). Furthermore, Colorado’s House Bill 1177 is in no way addressing the issue in a very unique way. Figure 1 below demonstrates nationwide...

Insulin cap in Colorado

In the United States, the topic of medication prices has increased substantially, specifically insulin. Insulin is a medication used to treat type one Diabetes which typically costs a thousand dollars or more depending on how much you need, and how much your insurance is willing to pay. Colorado changed this with a bill designed to put a cap on the copay for insulin. The bill HB19-1216 was signed into law by Governor Jared Polis in May of 2019. This bill states that “a carrier that provides coverage for prescription insulin drugs pursuant to the terms of a health coverage plan the carrier offers shall cap the total amount that a covered person is required to pay for a covered prescription insulin drug at an amount not to exceed one hundred dollars per thirty-day supply of insulin, regardless of the amount of type of insulin needed to fill the covered person’s prescription.” This bill will go into effect on January 1st, 2020 and will be overseen by the department of law who will investi...

TABOR and Colorado Politics Post-CC

       One of the more contentious topics within Colorado politics is budgeting and funding for projects, education, and revenue intake. This came to a head in this year's election with Proposition CC. Despite failing at the ballot box, the Democratic Party is pushing ahead with the 2020 legislative agenda that includes drafts to eliminate the Tax Payer's Bill of Rights or amend it to ensure more accessible revenue for the party's policy objectives. What is critical to the debate is the increasing partisan divide within Colorado, the historical shift from Republican control to Democrat trifectas in state government, and the institutional mechanisms that have hampered strategy for the dominant party. Also, in the mix are interest groups that influence local politics which can help uncover party strategy from another perspective.        The Colorado Fiscal Institute (CFI) a left-leaning think tank, is a key player in this battle, authoring s everal...