Skip to main content

Abandoned by Their Ally and Forced to Fight: US Foreign Policy Reversal Leaves Kurdish Militia Alone Against Turkish Forces


            As of October 6th, President Trump instructed all American military personnel to leave the North Syrian-Turkish border. President Trump was quoted in saying that it is time for us to get out and let others figure the situation out. The “situation” that President Trump is referring to is the conflict in Syria over territorial and power control in the region, particularly the opposing forces of the Kurds, Turkey, Bashar al-Assad’s regime, and Islamic extremists. The Kurdish militia have aided the efforts of the United States military to eliminate the spread of Islamic extremists and terrorism in the region since the Obama administration. The Kurds and the US military have also fought against Bashar al-Assad’s dictatorial regime in order to prevent ethnic cleansing in Syria. Now all of a sudden, President Trump has reversed our support of the Kurds and pulled out all US military support from the region. Just a few days after the initial announcement, the Turkish government ordered an invasion of the Kurdish-controlled region of Syria. The original Kurdish militia was a group that promoted insurrection within Turkey. While the current Kurdish militia, a part of the Syrian Democratic forces, is no longer what it once was, Turkish President Recep Erdogan views the Kurds as terrorists and has long threatened to invade Kurdish territory.
Image result for kurds turkey territory
This map shows how the territorial control of Syria is divided by the various actors involved.

            This sudden reversal of US foreign policy has already had dramatic implications in the conflict in Syria. Without the support of US troops, Kurdish forces have been forced to abandon prisons that hold over 10,000 Islamic State fighters. To make matters worse, two unnamed US officials have discovered that Turkish-supported fighters have begun to deliberately free these Islamic State fighters from their prisons, which now makes our fight against terrorism even more difficult. The situation is quickly deteriorating and now not only does Turkey stand to gain from this but Assad’s regime, Iran, and Russia as well. Iran and Russia have been staunch defenders of Assad’s regime and now that the Kurds are facing a seemingly inevitable slaughter, this could mean that Assad’s regime will seek to take control of the region. Senator Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut and member of the Foreign Relation Committee, stated that splitting NATO is a huge win for Russia. Turkey is a NATO ally, but the Kurds have greatly aided in our war against terrorism so now the US is facing a significant dilemma. Division amongst NATO allies does nothing but aid in the efforts of countries such as Russia to gain power.
            Members of Congress on both sides have been swift to condemn President Trump’s actions. Even some of his most unwavering supporters such as Republican Senator Lindsay Graham did not hesitate to label President Trump’s decision as sickening and shameful. Congress is seemingly moving quickly to approve a set of economic and military sanctions on Turkey in response to their invasion of Kurdish territory in Syria. Several NATO allies such as France, Germany, Norway, and the Netherlands have already announced they are ending the sale of arms to Turkey. As discussed in class on Monday, there seems to be plenty of unorthodox lawmaking occurring in Congress at the moment due to the severity of the situation. It is likely that much of the proposed sanctions have been worked out informally within groups behind closed doors. This kind of policymaking is also due to the fact that as each day passes, more Kurds will be killed and the potential of Assad and his allies growing in power rises exponentially. As of today, the proposed sanctions have not yet been passed but it seems to be the goal of Congress to enact said sanctions as soon as possible. It is rare that a policy decision by the President is criticized so intensely by members of both parties. Due to this bipartisan uproar, this should be one of those instances that there will be no real resistance in the passing of policy in a divided Congress. This situation changes by the hour so it remains to be seen if the Kurds will be able to fight off the invading Turkish forces before they are annihilated, even if the Congressional-supported sanctions are enacted.


Comments

  1. Bridget MurphyOctober 18, 2019 at 2:53 PM

    You do a really nice job analyzing the impacts of U.S. withdrawal on foreign relations and domestic politics. I agree that not only is it dangerous for us to leave the Kurds who have protected prisons holding ISIS fighters, but to break promises to our allies damages our national integrity and reliability. I think you also do a good job highlighting the precarious situation we and Turkey are in as NATO members and how other countries have responded to Turkey’s aggression in Syria. When legislators of the president’s party so heavily criticize the president, it makes for an interesting opening of bipartisan cooperation in Congress.

    ReplyDelete
  2. SamOctober 21, 2019 at 1:34 PM

    First, I would like to say you capture the heart of the issue very well with complex alliances intermingling within Syria, as well as the policy making steps that Congress has taken in regards to sanctions. Also, you note the issues of Russian entanglement which is a longstanding issue with PMCs in the area as well as material, equipment, and uniformed advisers. The main issue of contention that I want to lend more nuance to is the idea of the Kurds. Western media seems to think the Kurds are an ethnic monolith with similar policy interests and expectations e.g. a united Greater Kurdistan. This really is not the case as the the political histories and development of the various Kurdish populations have led to drastically different outcomes. The Kurdistan Regional Government in Iraq for instance has a closer working relationship with Turkey due to economic interests, and Masoud Barzani cooperating to remove the PKK/YPG militants from Northern Iraq in 2015. The Syrian Kurds in Rojava also just recently gained U.S. support unlike the Iraqi Kurds which gained support as part of wider Cold War policies in the region in the late 1960s early 70s. There is also a weird bit of history that we should be aware of as well; the Syrians under Hafez al-Assad harbored the PKK within their borders and allowed the militants to launch cross border attacks into Turkey up until 1998. The PYD (Democratic Union Party) in Syria however still uses the ideology of Abdullah Ocalan (leader of the PKK) to some extent. Granted this splitting hairs, but it is important to note the connection between militant factions in Turkey and Syria. There is a decent amount of literature and significant amounts of propaganda to sift through on this subject alone. I highly recommend any works from Denise Natali, Joost Hiltermann, David McDowall, and Michael Gunter to name a few if you're really interested.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Eddy BaisleyOctober 21, 2019 at 7:03 PM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Eddy BaisleyOctober 21, 2019 at 7:04 PM

      I appreciate your post regarding the situation in Syria and Trump's action to pull troops out of the country. I believe you do a good job giving the details of the situation and how complicated the alliances are throughout the region of northern Syria. But Although I acknowledge your point of view, and understand where you are coming from I do disagree with a few of your conclusions. Mainly, I would have to disagree with you on your general point that pulling U.S. troops out of Syria was a bad idea. Even though Trump's decision may be seen as "abandoning allies" I believe it was the right move. To what extent is it the United Stats' responsibility to constantly police the rest of the world? When will our military intervention into other sovereign countries end? In my opinion our endless militarism into the Middle East needs to stop, because obviously our presence in these countries has not helped stabilize the region. Just look at the example of Libya and how "safe" the country has been since the U.S. backed overthrow of Gaddafi. It is important note that I am definitely not what you would call a "Trump supporter" and I find myself critiquing his policies constantly, however I do believe he made the right choice in pulling us our of Syria for the simple fact that it is not the United States' responsibility to be meddling in the affairs of other countries

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

TABOR & Proposition CC: Providing Context to Colorado's Tax Problem

Edward Baisley Prof. Matthew Hitt POLS 304 Dec. 2019 Blog Post 3 (TABOR and Proposition CC) Colorado's tax system is very unique in comparison to pretty much every other state in the U.S. Arguably the biggest aspect of the tax system that is unique is the amendment to the Colorado Constitution known as TABOR or the Tax Payers Bill of Rights. This amendment which was drafted into law in 1992, has many implications for Colorado's state and local governments. One of the main implications is that TABOR requires the state and local governments of Colorado to acquire voter approval before any tax increase can be implemented. Some other more less known implications are detailed by Denver Post author Anna Staver, she explains that TABOR: “ Limits how many tax dollars governments can keep … It’s called the TABOR cap, anything a government collects above the cap gets returned as a TABOR tax refund … (TABOR) Limits when lawmakers can ask voters to raise taxe...
1 comment
Read more

The Flawed American Electoral System

A free and fair election is one that is inclusive to all of the population. A democratic state requires active citizen participation to ensure equal representation. The framers of the constitution originally wanted the United States government to only be governed by educated white men. It was not until 1920 that the 19th amendment was passed that allowed white females to vote in America. Then it was not until the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that allowed African-Americans the right to vote freely. There were many amendments and reforms throughout history that has changed our election system. Different changes to state election process will ensure an equitable election system. This is a highly debated legislative issue that goes back and forth for the past decade and into the 2020 election. It is crucial for such a powerful and free country to protect its proud democratic values.  There are still issues with the American election systems. There are a lot of holes in represe...
1 comment
Read more

The Ballot Initiative in Colorado

    One of the most distinctive features of the legislative process in Colorado is the prevalence of the ballot initiative. In the election this November, voters had the opportunity to approve their own laws. One of these laws included a proposition that would legalize sports betting.     This is not the first time that voters have had the ability to make hugely influential decisions. Voters have voted to legalize marijuana. In Colorado, they even approve tax increases because of the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, or TABOR. This means that, unlike in other states, Colorado voters have legislative power of their own.      One of these most recent initiatives involved sports betting. Colorado would legalize sports betting, but sports betting would be taxed. This revenue would be used to fund plans to address Colorado's water problem. However, according to the Colorado Sun, the money from sports betting will not generate any money to address these water iss...
Post a Comment
Read more