Proposition DD was Closer Than it Should've Been

Colten Dudley

Prof. Hitt

POLS 304

Dec. 4, 2019

When one thinks of the state Colorado, gambling and sports rarely come to mind first, that is unless the sport is skiing. The state has very few casinos and is a history of sports teams that fall into the bounds of mediocre to the brink-of-greatness. That being said, Colorado does suffer from a lack of water availability, and thus, for some reason, these two elements came together to foster Proposition DD, a measure voted on in the 2019 Colorado Ballot.

This measure asked voters 5 to legalize (and subsequently, tax) sports betting. The tax and fee revenue from sports betting is intended to pay for the regulation of sports betting and provide a funding source for the Colorado Water Plan and other water-related obligations. This measure, while making very little logical sense to many, won on the ballot, but not by a very large margin.

As seen from this chart, provided by TheDenverChannel.com, proposition DD barely won in Colorado, showing that the State is more evenly divided over certain propositions, despite the belief that Colorado is more blue than red. But why did it meet such a split opinion?

The Colorado Water Plan, released by the state in 2015, identifies objectives, goals, and actions by which Colorado will address future statewide water needs. This is a widely non-partisan cause, and the bill saw much bipartisan support, so why did the public seem so split on the bill? It is now thought that the wording of the bill, which was confusing at best and misleading at worst, saw many people vote against it. Proposition DD’s ballot question asked "Shall state taxes be increased by twenty-nine million dollars annually to fund state water projects and commitments and to pay for the regulation of sports betting through licensed casinos by authorizing a tax on sports betting of ten percent of net sports betting proceeds, and to impose the tax on persons licensed to conduct sports betting?"

The wording was confusing, so the race was closer than it should have been, arguably. Despite the state of Colorado lacking many locations where legal sports betting could occur and be taxed (like Black Hawk or the Lodge Casino’s), the measure was passed, and the combination of people who supported this measure, like business owners and agricultural workers clearly used their combined numbers to see a win, if only a marginal one over those who opposed the bill. With a more accessible wording of the measure and more educationally-based advertisements, I think the proposition would’ve been much closer.

Sources

Comments

Proposition DD: Let the Bets Flow

On November 5 th , 2019, one of the two measures placed on the ballot in Colorado was Proposition DD, giving the electorate a referendum on the legality of sports betting within the state; it also would impose a tax upon the net revenue of those establishments accepting such bets, the majority of which would provide funding for the Colorado Water Plan and the remainder of which would be used to regulate sports betting and provide services for gambling addiction. Since 1992, gambling on the outcome of most sporting events had been outlawed nationally under the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, or PASPA, though with the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association , this Act was deemed unconstitutional, and state legislatures became free to legislate regarding sports betting and its legality. Proposition DD was put to a public ballot under the provisions of the TABOR amendment to the Colorado Constitution, a ‘Taxpayer Bill of Rights’ ...

The Proponents of Proposition DD

Proposition DD and its proponents One of the most significant and noteworthy results of the recent elections in Colorado was the passing of Proposition DD. A legislative proposition is a proposal placed on the ballot by the state legislature itself. The legislature in Denver referred the measure with House Bill 1327 during the spring season, with easy bipartisan support. [1] The proposition however did not receive such widespread support from the public, only narrowly passing, and being too close to call on election night. This is illustrated below. [2] The passage of Proposition DD legalised gambling on sports events, beginning in six months’ time; making Colorado the nineteenth state to legalise sports betting. Colorado’s seventeen casino operators will be eligible to apply for licenses for both physical and online sportsbooks, with the Colorado Division of Gaming being tasked to regulate the market. [3] ‘Yes on Proposition DD’ raised about $2.83 million for ca...

Immigration Visas and Polarization

Megan King The story I decided to investigate in National News is , “ Federal Judges Block Trump Policy Targeting Legal Immigrants on Public Benefits ” by Claire Hansen demonstrates how difficult the policymaking procedure can be. In regard to the separations of powers, this ideology does give each branch equal representation, which in this case was to block a new policy. In this situation, three judges filed lawsuits because the new policy the Government was going to implement that visas could be denied if they think that immigrants who are going to use public benefits. It is known as the “public charge” policy which is basically, “any individual who is deemed likely to accept a benefit is considered a public charger” which was just another attempt from the Trump Administration desiring to stop immigration (Hansen). There has already been policies in place that set up circumstances that Immigration Courts and the Government have set up to deny immigration residence just in...

POLS 304@CSU Fall 2019

Search This Blog