Skip to main content

Colorado's New Waste Diversion Venture

              This past year the Colorado General Assembly made a big move to help decrease Coloradoans waste. The 2019 Regular Session passed a bill called the Front Range Waste Diversion Enterprise Grant Program or SB19-192. This bill was signed by Governor Polis in May of 2019. The bill created a new waste diversion grant program that will affect the Front Range communities. These communities include the counties of Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Douglas, Elbert, El Paso, Jefferson, Larimer, Pueblo, Teller, and Weld and the cities and counties of Broomfield and Denver. Essentially this new law will create a fee for landfill usage. The fee will take effect in January of 2020 and there will be a board of 13-members that will oversee the grant program. The law creates the “front range waste diversion enterprise” and the enterprise gets to place a fee and collect a user fee on every load of landfill waste in the communities listed above. Then, all the money that the enterprise collects will go towards the fund for the Front Range Waste Diversion Grant Program. Specifically, the fees will begin at 15 cents per cubic yard per load starting in January of 2020 and go through December 2020, then it will go up 15 cents for the next years, then in January of 2023 the fee will change to 60 cents per cubic yard per load, and finally in 2024 the fee will be adjusted for inflation annually. The entities that are available for grants are cities, counties, municipalities, non-profit and for-profit businesses that are apart of waste removal or diversion, and lastly institutions of higher education and public or private schools. The waste diversion goals are set to a “32% diversion by 2021, 39% diversion by 2026, and 51% diversion by 2036” and the enterprise will provide assistance to achieve these waste goals. Overall, these goals are monumental for waste management in this region.  
              The bill was introduced into the Senate of the General Assembly, into the Local Government committee. The main sponsors are Republican Sen. Kevin Priola, Democrat Sen. Faith Winter,
Democrat Rep. Lisa Cutter, and Democrat Rep. Dominique Jackson. The other co-sponsors are mainly representatives and senators of the Democratic party. It appears that more Democrats support this bill than conservatives in the General Assembly. Still, this isn’t to say that Colorado Republicans dislike recycling, but based on support and sponsorship more democrats seemed to promote the bill. This may be due to increasing polarization in our country and that nowadays environmental protections seem to be a policy area that Democrats are very passionate about. In the book, Historical Development of Congress by Adler, Jenkins, and Shipan, many times throughout the book they highlight the extreme and increasing polarization of  the country, so its not wrong to assume this bill may also be a tied into a case of polarization as well. Another reason this bill may have come about is due to Colorado shifting from a Republican majority to a Democratic majority. Author John A. Straayer’s article, “The Colorado General Assembly: It Ain’t What It Used to Be,” states that Colorado’s partisanship has started to shift to a more liberal ideology in the last decade. However, even if more Democrats seemed to sponsor this bill it’s important to remember the incentivized aspect placed into the bill. The ability to gain a grant if waste diversion meets the goals of the enterprise is a portion of the bill that may help everyone collectively support the bill even more.
Nevertheless, in the next month these new fees will be put into place and then we will better be able to tell if this waste diversion bill creates a polarized controversy with the folks on the Front Range. However, for some this new law brings hope. For example, the article from The Colorado Sun titled, “Colorado’s recycling rate improves to 17.2%, but we’re producing more trash than ever” by Tamara Chuang states that on “the average Coloradan generates 5.6 pounds of trash, of which 1.2 pounds is recycled.” The figure below shows the data that Chuang describes. Compared to other states Colorado has much more waste per person and recycles very little. Still, Chuang also highlights that many recycling non-profit groups are feeling more optimistic about Colorado’s future with recycling due to the Front Range Waste Diversion Enterprise Grant Program that could incentivize  less landfill disposal and lead to a higher recycling rate. Overall, time will only tell how this law will affect Colorado’s recycling rate and citizens true feelings on this law.

How much a Coloradan recycles every day



Work Cited:
https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb19-192

Adler, E. Scott, et al. The United States Congress. W.W. Norton & Company, 2019.

https://coloradosun.com/2019/11/12/colorados-recycling-rate-improves-to-17-2-but-were-producing-more-trash-than-ever/

Straayer, John A. “The Colorado General Assembly: It Ain’t What it Used to Be.”





Comments

  1. KaitlynAndersonDecember 5, 2019 at 8:35 PM

    This was a very well written article. I had not heard about this issue, so this is really interesting to me. With the rate increasing every year, it will get very expensive for the cities, or whoever is paying that bill! The chart ties the article together very well. It will be interesting to see how this impacts the state in a few years.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mary LeonardDecember 9, 2019 at 7:56 PM

    This is interesting, I did not realize that waste was such a big issue here. I wonder how people will actually be able to produce less waste. Otherwise it may just make citizens made that they have to pay more. I did not know that Colorado recycles so much less than other states, hopefully this bill changes that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Colten DudleyDecember 11, 2019 at 11:02 AM

    I liked this piece a lot. Highlighting waste in Colorado, a bigger issue than many believe it to be, was a cool angle to take, and it left me curious, wondering how Coloradans would go about limiting waste and increasing recycling. I think my time at CSU has led me to believe everyone in the state was as waste conscious as CSU.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Immigration Visas and Polarization

Megan King  The story I decided to investigate in National News is , “ Federal Judges Block Trump Policy Targeting Legal Immigrants on Public Benefits ” by Claire Hansen demonstrates how difficult the policymaking procedure can be. In regard to the separations of powers, this ideology does give each branch equal representation, which in this case was to block a new policy. In this situation, three judges filed lawsuits because the new policy the Government was going to implement that visas could be denied if they think that immigrants who are going to use public benefits. It is known as the “public charge” policy which is basically, “any individual who is deemed likely to accept a benefit is considered a public charger” which was just another attempt from the Trump Administration desiring to stop immigration (Hansen). There has already been policies in place that set up circumstances that Immigration Courts and the Government have set up to deny immigration residence just in...
2 comments
Read more

Proposition DD: Let the Bets Flow

On November 5 th , 2019, one of the two measures placed on the ballot in Colorado was Proposition DD, giving the electorate a referendum on the legality of sports betting within the state; it also would impose a tax upon the net revenue of those establishments accepting such bets, the majority of which would provide funding for the Colorado Water Plan and the remainder of which would be used to regulate sports betting and provide services for gambling addiction. Since 1992, gambling on the outcome of most sporting events had been outlawed nationally under the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, or PASPA, though with the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association , this Act was deemed unconstitutional, and state legislatures became free to legislate regarding sports betting and its legality. Proposition DD was put to a public ballot under the provisions of the TABOR amendment to the Colorado Constitution, a ‘Taxpayer Bill of Rights’ ...
2 comments
Read more

The Proponents of Proposition DD

Proposition DD and its proponents One of the most significant and noteworthy results of the recent elections in Colorado was the passing of Proposition DD. A legislative proposition is a proposal placed on the ballot by the state legislature itself. The legislature in Denver referred the measure with House Bill 1327 during the spring season, with easy bipartisan support. [1] The proposition however did not receive such widespread support from the public, only narrowly passing, and being too close to call on election night. This is illustrated below. [2] The passage of Proposition DD legalised gambling on sports events, beginning in six months’ time; making Colorado the nineteenth state to legalise sports betting. Colorado’s seventeen casino operators will be eligible to apply for licenses for both physical and online sportsbooks, with the Colorado Division of Gaming being tasked to regulate the market. [3] ‘Yes on Proposition DD’ raised about $2.83 million for ca...
Post a Comment
Read more