Skip to main content

Colorado Lobbying

Mary Leonard
Blog Post 3

            The recent election in Colorado meant changes in legislation and policy not only from the votes of citizens, but also due to the decisions of legislators. The possibility for change also come with an increase of spending to and from lobbying firms to help motivate certain alterations. In the world of politics, money has become the driving force behind policy change for better or for worse. Money is considered the lifeblood of Congressional campaigns, and therefore is also very vital to even local votes.

A new record has been set in lobbying spending in Colorado this year, hitting a whopping $36.4 million. This is 9% more than was spent last year. Various groups have contributed to this spending including business interests, associations, nonprofits, and more. This large amount greatly adds to the national spending of about $3.45 billion on lobbying in 2018. According to the author of the Colorado Sun article explaining this rise in lobbying spending, Sandra Fish, more than 600 firms and individuals have joined in to the lobbying numbers in Colorado. (Fish)


According to Hall and Deadroff, lobbying is a form of legislative subsidy. In other words, it is a matching grant of policy information and labor that helps convince legislators to achieve certain desired goals. The subsidy increases the ability for legislators to be more productive on the issues the lobbyists care about. The graph above shows the varying of levels of spending month to month from 2018-2019. March and April had the largest amount due to the focus of lawmakers on certain major bills at the time. As lawmakers begin to pay more attention and make decisions to specific legislation proposals in order, lobbyists also up their game to sway these choices.

The two industries that spend the most on lobbying in Colorado are unsurprisingly the Cannabis and the Oil industry. These are highly debated industries so it is extremely valuable to them to employ lobbyists to try to influence policy making. Along with this, the bill to create a statewide paid family leave program attracted around 200 lobbyists. The lobbying on this bill ended up proving successful as legislators decided to scale back on it in order to “to study the issue”. (Fish)
.
The top-ranking lobbyist in Colorado is Colorado Legislative Services, followed by Brandeberry McKenna Public Affairs, and Axiom Strategies, and the company that paid the most to groups like these was Xcel Energy at $374,876. Its goal for spending this much was for the “renewal of the Public Utilities Commission and a bill that set carbon emissions reduction targets”. It succeeded in renewing the Public Utilities Commission, but the emissions reductions did not pass. Another group, Conservation Colorado, which fights for environmental rights and against oil and gas production in the state, also greatly contributed to lobbying by paying $84,000 on one single bill, which, in total, almost tripled their spending from last year. (Fish)

Lobbying is a way for interest groups and citizens to have their opinions heard which helps legislators make more representative choices. However, Colorado’s Secretary of State, Jena Griswold, has concerns about the amount of spending that is being done due to the fact that majority of it is done by big corporations. Therefore, they have the most influence. To solve this issue, she believes that there needs to be an increase in transparency. This transparency is done though system reforms that make payments to lobbyists and documentation of how much they receive more visible. This has been a goal because their income can often be unreported due to various loopholes. (Fish)

Lobbying, in an essence, is not necessarily a bad thing in the political atmosphere, however it can become risky if it is not completely transparent. Money is one of the most important driving forces of politics, but can quickly lead to corruption and bad blood.

Fish, Sandra. Colorado Sun. August 20, 2019. “Lobbying Spending Sets New Record in Colorado, as
Interests Shift to Influence Democratic-Controlled Capitol”.
https://coloradosun.com/2019/08/20/lobbying-spending-sets-new-record-colorado/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Proposition DD: Let the Bets Flow

On November 5 th , 2019, one of the two measures placed on the ballot in Colorado was Proposition DD, giving the electorate a referendum on the legality of sports betting within the state; it also would impose a tax upon the net revenue of those establishments accepting such bets, the majority of which would provide funding for the Colorado Water Plan and the remainder of which would be used to regulate sports betting and provide services for gambling addiction. Since 1992, gambling on the outcome of most sporting events had been outlawed nationally under the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, or PASPA, though with the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association , this Act was deemed unconstitutional, and state legislatures became free to legislate regarding sports betting and its legality. Proposition DD was put to a public ballot under the provisions of the TABOR amendment to the Colorado Constitution, a ‘Taxpayer Bill of Rights’ ...
2 comments
Read more

The Proponents of Proposition DD

Proposition DD and its proponents One of the most significant and noteworthy results of the recent elections in Colorado was the passing of Proposition DD. A legislative proposition is a proposal placed on the ballot by the state legislature itself. The legislature in Denver referred the measure with House Bill 1327 during the spring season, with easy bipartisan support. [1] The proposition however did not receive such widespread support from the public, only narrowly passing, and being too close to call on election night. This is illustrated below. [2] The passage of Proposition DD legalised gambling on sports events, beginning in six months’ time; making Colorado the nineteenth state to legalise sports betting. Colorado’s seventeen casino operators will be eligible to apply for licenses for both physical and online sportsbooks, with the Colorado Division of Gaming being tasked to regulate the market. [3] ‘Yes on Proposition DD’ raised about $2.83 million for ca...
Post a Comment
Read more

Immigration Visas and Polarization

Megan King  The story I decided to investigate in National News is , “ Federal Judges Block Trump Policy Targeting Legal Immigrants on Public Benefits ” by Claire Hansen demonstrates how difficult the policymaking procedure can be. In regard to the separations of powers, this ideology does give each branch equal representation, which in this case was to block a new policy. In this situation, three judges filed lawsuits because the new policy the Government was going to implement that visas could be denied if they think that immigrants who are going to use public benefits. It is known as the “public charge” policy which is basically, “any individual who is deemed likely to accept a benefit is considered a public charger” which was just another attempt from the Trump Administration desiring to stop immigration (Hansen). There has already been policies in place that set up circumstances that Immigration Courts and the Government have set up to deny immigration residence just in...
2 comments
Read more