Skip to main content

Colorado Lobbying

Mary Leonard
Blog Post 3

            The recent election in Colorado meant changes in legislation and policy not only from the votes of citizens, but also due to the decisions of legislators. The possibility for change also come with an increase of spending to and from lobbying firms to help motivate certain alterations. In the world of politics, money has become the driving force behind policy change for better or for worse. Money is considered the lifeblood of Congressional campaigns, and therefore is also very vital to even local votes.

A new record has been set in lobbying spending in Colorado this year, hitting a whopping $36.4 million. This is 9% more than was spent last year. Various groups have contributed to this spending including business interests, associations, nonprofits, and more. This large amount greatly adds to the national spending of about $3.45 billion on lobbying in 2018. According to the author of the Colorado Sun article explaining this rise in lobbying spending, Sandra Fish, more than 600 firms and individuals have joined in to the lobbying numbers in Colorado. (Fish)



According to Hall and Deadroff, lobbying is a form of legislative subsidy. In other words, it is a matching grant of policy information and labor that helps convince legislators to achieve certain desired goals. The subsidy increases the ability for legislators to be more productive on the issues the lobbyists care about. The graph above shows the varying of levels of spending month to month from 2018-2019. March and April had the largest amount due to the focus of lawmakers on certain major bills at the time. As lawmakers begin to pay more attention and make decisions to specific legislation proposals in order, lobbyists also up their game to sway these choices.

The two industries that spend the most on lobbying in Colorado are unsurprisingly the Cannabis and the Oil industry. These are highly debated industries so it is extremely valuable to them to employ lobbyists to try to influence policy making. Along with this, the bill to create a statewide paid family leave program attracted around 200 lobbyists. The lobbying on this bill ended up proving successful as legislators decided to scale back on it in order to “to study the issue”. (Fish)
.
The top-ranking lobbyist in Colorado is Colorado Legislative Services, followed by Brandeberry McKenna Public Affairs, and Axiom Strategies, and the company that paid the most to groups like these was Xcel Energy at $374,876. Its goal for spending this much was for the “renewal of the Public Utilities Commission and a bill that set carbon emissions reduction targets”. It succeeded in renewing the Public Utilities Commission, but the emissions reductions did not pass. Another group, Conservation Colorado, which fights for environmental rights and against oil and gas production in the state, also greatly contributed to lobbying by paying $84,000 on one single bill, which, in total, almost tripled their spending from last year. (Fish)

Lobbying is a way for interest groups and citizens to have their opinions heard which helps legislators make more representative choices. However, Colorado’s Secretary of State, Jena Griswold, has concerns about the amount of spending that is being done due to the fact that majority of it is done by big corporations. Therefore, they have the most influence. To solve this issue, she believes that there needs to be an increase in transparency. This transparency is done though system reforms that make payments to lobbyists and documentation of how much they receive more visible. This has been a goal because their income can often be unreported due to various loopholes. (Fish)

Lobbying, in an essence, is not necessarily a bad thing in the political atmosphere, however it can become risky if it is not completely transparent. Money is one of the most important driving forces of politics, but can quickly lead to corruption and bad blood.

Fish, Sandra. Colorado Sun. August 20, 2019. “Lobbying Spending Sets New Record in Colorado, as
Interests Shift to Influence Democratic-Controlled Capitol”.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gun Control in Colorado

Due to the prevalence of mass shootings in the United States, many states have adapted gun legislation to target the issue. Colorado is no exception. The House Bill 1177 or more commonly known as “the red flag bill” was passed this previous legislative session (Aguilar). The bill allows the court to seize firearms from individuals who are deemed a threat to themselves or to others (Aguilar). This considerable gun legislation is significant for Democrats who have advocated for gun control for years. More importantly, the passing of this bill may once again demonstrate which party has been gaining momentum in Colorado these past few years. Colorado’s legislature has generally sided to the left in recent times (Strayer 141). This is a significant shift from the more Republican leaning legislature that Colorado was previously used to (Strayer 141). Furthermore, Colorado’s House Bill 1177 is in no way addressing the issue in a very unique way. Figure 1 below demonstrates nationwide...

Insulin cap in Colorado

In the United States, the topic of medication prices has increased substantially, specifically insulin. Insulin is a medication used to treat type one Diabetes which typically costs a thousand dollars or more depending on how much you need, and how much your insurance is willing to pay. Colorado changed this with a bill designed to put a cap on the copay for insulin. The bill HB19-1216 was signed into law by Governor Jared Polis in May of 2019. This bill states that “a carrier that provides coverage for prescription insulin drugs pursuant to the terms of a health coverage plan the carrier offers shall cap the total amount that a covered person is required to pay for a covered prescription insulin drug at an amount not to exceed one hundred dollars per thirty-day supply of insulin, regardless of the amount of type of insulin needed to fill the covered person’s prescription.” This bill will go into effect on January 1st, 2020 and will be overseen by the department of law who will investi...

TABOR and Colorado Politics Post-CC

       One of the more contentious topics within Colorado politics is budgeting and funding for projects, education, and revenue intake. This came to a head in this year's election with Proposition CC. Despite failing at the ballot box, the Democratic Party is pushing ahead with the 2020 legislative agenda that includes drafts to eliminate the Tax Payer's Bill of Rights or amend it to ensure more accessible revenue for the party's policy objectives. What is critical to the debate is the increasing partisan divide within Colorado, the historical shift from Republican control to Democrat trifectas in state government, and the institutional mechanisms that have hampered strategy for the dominant party. Also, in the mix are interest groups that influence local politics which can help uncover party strategy from another perspective.        The Colorado Fiscal Institute (CFI) a left-leaning think tank, is a key player in this battle, authoring s everal...