Skip to main content

Colorado Legislation and Arms Limitations

The Columbine High School shooting that took place in 1999 claimed the lives of 15 people and wounded 28. Since then the topic of gun control has sparked debates supporting both sides of the argument and from state to state the laws of carrying differs. As of now, a very brief summary of Colorado state law concerning personal arm restrictions are:
"Colorado law also allows a person to possess a handgun in a dwelling, place of business, or automobile. However, when you carry the weapon into your home, business, hotel room, etc. it must be in plain view" (colorado.gov). And according to the National Rifle Association for Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA), in Colorado, there is no Permit to Purchase required for a rifle, shotgun or handgun. There is no required Registration of Firearms for rifles, shotguns or handguns. There is no Licensing of Owner for rifles, shotguns or handguns, and there is no permit to carry rifles or shotguns, however, a permit to carry is required for handguns (NRA-ILA).

One of the most recent bills passed on this topic, that was discussed today in class, is HB19-1177, the Extreme Risk Protection Order bill. This bill was in the Engrossed stage, between the second and third readings, and it had originated in the House. The upshot of the bill is that if a family/household member, or law enforcement officer, felt that an individual is potentially a risk to themselves or others by "having a firearm in his or her custody or control or by possessing, purchasing, or receiving a firearm" (leg.colorado.gov), that concerned citizen could petition for the prohibition of that individual possessing a firearm for 364 days. This bill was signed into law on April 12, 2019.  

In Colorado, each bill and law goes through extensive phases. A few of these phases include; Drafting the bill and introducing it to either the House or the Senate, being referred to a committee to write out the logistics, then sending the bills to the opposite chamber of origin to go through various phases of readings. These phases of readings are; Revised, Engrossed, Rerevised, and Reengrossed. Within these stages of readings, the bills can be amended and adhered, however, once the bill returns to its origin and the two chambers cannot agree on the versions of the bill, it dies (Legislative Legal Services). 
https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/How%20a%20bill%20becomes%20law.pdf

This is not an uncommon occurrence because as Professor Hitt has stated, Colorado is the second most politically polarized state in the United States. 

Along with readings, the bills must be voted on by the Committee of the Whole, also known as the COW. Along with being voted on and amended in order to be finally sent to the Governor's office and signed into law, both chambers must produce the exact same bill in order to reach this final step. One difference between the Colorado State Legislative process and the United States Legislative process is that the President has a final say in the passing of a law but if the Governor doesn't vote yes or no on a bill after 10 days, it automatically becomes a law (colorado.gov).

Bills also have to pass through many different committees in both the House and Senate before being completed and ready to sign.  The ERPO bill went through nearly 14 changes and amendments before being signed by both the president of the House and Senate and sent to the Governor.  The General Assembly acknowledges House Judiciary and House Appropriations committees as well as the Senate Appropriations and State, Senate, & Military Affairs as the notable committees that helped this bill pass.  

After cases such as the Aurora Theater Shooting, there was the biggest spike in firearm purchases in the past 18 years of the data. As seen in the first figure, after this bill passed into law, in July of 2019 Colorado saw one of the lowest numbers of firearms purchases since 2014. This could have been a result of the April bill passing, but as a state, we will only begin to see possible change when the law goes into effect on January 1, 2020. 





Work Cited
“Colorado Gun Laws.” 2014. Colorado State Patrol - CSPhttps://www.colorado.gov/pacific/csp/colorado-gun-laws (December 5, 2019).
“Extreme Risk Protection Orders | Colorado General Assembly.” http://leg.colorado.gov/bills/hb19-1177 (December 5, 2019).
How a Bill Becomes a Law in Coloradohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLOeY1h1TFo (December 5, 2019).
Markus, Ben. “What The Numbers Tell Us About Guns In Colorado.” Colorado Public Radiohttps://www.cpr.org/2018/03/26/what-the-numbers-tell-us-about-guns-in-colorado/ (December 5, 2019).
NRA-ILA. “NRA-ILA | Colorado Gun Laws.” NRA-ILAhttps://www.nraila.org/gun-laws/state-gun-laws/colorado/ (December 5, 2019).

Comments

  1. I really liked your post! It was very detailed about the process of making laws and explained very well what the laws currently are on gun ownership in Colorado. I thought it was very smart on how you incorporated the material discussed in class and it made it easier to follow.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I appreciate that you included an analysis of the legislative process and tied it back to gun control. This illustrates how the process is already very complex and can become even more complex when there is a very controversial issue that the bill is addressing. I also liked that you incorporated background on the issue. Colorado does have a history with gun violence that is important to consider when talking about gun control. Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Millie,

    I enjoyed your blog. Obviously, gun control is a very hot topic with politics and will more than likely continue to be that way for some time. Like those comments above me, I also like how you included an analysis of the legislative process, but I also would have liked to hear a bit more information on the issue itself. I discussed this bill in another one of my classes the other day and something I would have liked to see in your article would have been the arguments on both sides of the spectrum. One of the people in my discussion group of that class argued that this would be taking away the rights of the individual who would be getting their firearm taken away while others argued where the compromise is and questioned how far the government should go to try to save lives, even if that means potentially taking away some rights? This is a very interesting topic that could be talked about for hours, but overall I think you did a pretty good job.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good job on your blog. I think you did a nice job being specific and tying in an analysis of the Legislative process. I liked how you discussed where Colorado was years ago and where Colorado is now with gun control.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Two-Party System: Possible Impacts on Polarization & Congressional Policy Making

Edward Baisley Prof. Matthew Hitt POLS 304 16 Oct. 2019 Blog Post 2 (Two Party System)             The two-party system in the United States of America has been an integral part of our political culture since the country’s inception in the 1700’s. Since then, our country has accepted this system as an inevitable part of how our nation’s leaders are chosen, nominated, and elected into office. Now days, when it comes to our contemporary national congress, both parties have spent an incredible amount of money and resources in an attempt to seize majority control in both the House and the Senate. This attempt to seize majority power in our legislative branch has led to a situation of heated competition. In fact, in recent history, we as citizens of this nation have seen our national Legislator become a partisan battle ground in which both parties and their members are seemingly polarized to an extent that the ...

TABOR and Colorado Politics Post-CC

       One of the more contentious topics within Colorado politics is budgeting and funding for projects, education, and revenue intake. This came to a head in this year's election with Proposition CC. Despite failing at the ballot box, the Democratic Party is pushing ahead with the 2020 legislative agenda that includes drafts to eliminate the Tax Payer's Bill of Rights or amend it to ensure more accessible revenue for the party's policy objectives. What is critical to the debate is the increasing partisan divide within Colorado, the historical shift from Republican control to Democrat trifectas in state government, and the institutional mechanisms that have hampered strategy for the dominant party. Also, in the mix are interest groups that influence local politics which can help uncover party strategy from another perspective.        The Colorado Fiscal Institute (CFI) a left-leaning think tank, is a key player in this battle, authoring s everal...

Insulin cap in Colorado

In the United States, the topic of medication prices has increased substantially, specifically insulin. Insulin is a medication used to treat type one Diabetes which typically costs a thousand dollars or more depending on how much you need, and how much your insurance is willing to pay. Colorado changed this with a bill designed to put a cap on the copay for insulin. The bill HB19-1216 was signed into law by Governor Jared Polis in May of 2019. This bill states that “a carrier that provides coverage for prescription insulin drugs pursuant to the terms of a health coverage plan the carrier offers shall cap the total amount that a covered person is required to pay for a covered prescription insulin drug at an amount not to exceed one hundred dollars per thirty-day supply of insulin, regardless of the amount of type of insulin needed to fill the covered person’s prescription.” This bill will go into effect on January 1st, 2020 and will be overseen by the department of law who will investi...