Skip to main content

Republican Minority Party Disadvantage in Upcoming Session

The Colorado General Assembly will convene on January 8, 2020. There are many issues to be tackled during this session and it is rumored to be one of the most controversial and busy sessions yet. One of the top priorities of Governor Jared Polis is to repeal tax breaks and lower the state’s income tax. Since 2016, the state auditor’s office has begun the process of reviewing more than 200 tax breaks in Colorado in order to learn of their impact (Frank, 2019). After reviewing these tax breaks in 2018 and 2019, it is up to the lawmakers to decide whether to keep them or do away with them. In order to determine what should be done, a Tax Expenditure Evaluation committee has been created to consider policy recommendations from the auditor’s office. They will then determine what to do with the tax credits. The committee will consist of four Democrats and two Republicans. They will meet up to four times and are able to sponsor up to five bills (Frank, 2019).

Taxation is largely a polarized issue. Republicans most often only desire taxes that are necessary for the basic functions of government. They want low taxes and low government involvement. They would be in favor of keeping these tax breaks. Democrats, on the other hand, are usually in favor of more taxes for more government involvement and programs. They will like to see these tax breaks eliminated. Because of this polarization, there is going to be a lot of debate regarding this issue in the 2020 General Assembly. 

In an article by Kelsey Hinchliffe and Frances Lee, they discuss how polarized some state legislatures have become, especially in states that are more competitive between parties. Colorado is currently controlled by the Democratic party, so the Democratic majority will have a much easier time passing their legislation through the chambers. A quote from Alan Rosenthal in 1990 in regard to opposing parties defeating each other in elections, he says, “… each tries to discredit the other, not only during an election campaign but also during the conduct of government” (Hinchliffe and Lee, 2016). This will be the position of the Republicans during the next session. Because they are the minority, they will be trying to discredit the Democrats and block their legislation. Adler, Jenkins, and Shipan (2019) say that when a party is in the minority and without their party in the presidency, their goal is to just oppose the majority and/or president. These authors spoke of it on a congressional level, but this can be translated down to a state legislature level as well. With Republicans in the Colorado General Assembly opposing the elimination of tax breaks, their main goal will be to take down any legislation on the topic proposed by Democrats and the Tax Expenditure Evaluation committee. Below is the division in the Colorado General Assembly between Republicans and Democrats. Across the Assembly, Democrats have a large margin of 60% control against 40% Republican control, so it will be very difficult for Republicans to block legislation in this upcoming session.

Data from https://ballotpedia.org/Colorado_House_of_Representatives and 
https://ballotpedia.org/Colorado_State_Senate

https://coloradosun.com/2019/05/29/colorado-lawmakers-interim-study-committees/ 

Comments

  1. Kaitlyn, I found your post to be very informative. It is great that the committee looking into this issue is made up of both Republicans and Democrats. Hopefully this bipartisan effort will lead to a consensus of whether tax breaks should exist or not.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Two-Party System: Possible Impacts on Polarization & Congressional Policy Making

Edward Baisley Prof. Matthew Hitt POLS 304 16 Oct. 2019 Blog Post 2 (Two Party System)             The two-party system in the United States of America has been an integral part of our political culture since the country’s inception in the 1700’s. Since then, our country has accepted this system as an inevitable part of how our nation’s leaders are chosen, nominated, and elected into office. Now days, when it comes to our contemporary national congress, both parties have spent an incredible amount of money and resources in an attempt to seize majority control in both the House and the Senate. This attempt to seize majority power in our legislative branch has led to a situation of heated competition. In fact, in recent history, we as citizens of this nation have seen our national Legislator become a partisan battle ground in which both parties and their members are seemingly polarized to an extent that the ...

TABOR and Colorado Politics Post-CC

       One of the more contentious topics within Colorado politics is budgeting and funding for projects, education, and revenue intake. This came to a head in this year's election with Proposition CC. Despite failing at the ballot box, the Democratic Party is pushing ahead with the 2020 legislative agenda that includes drafts to eliminate the Tax Payer's Bill of Rights or amend it to ensure more accessible revenue for the party's policy objectives. What is critical to the debate is the increasing partisan divide within Colorado, the historical shift from Republican control to Democrat trifectas in state government, and the institutional mechanisms that have hampered strategy for the dominant party. Also, in the mix are interest groups that influence local politics which can help uncover party strategy from another perspective.        The Colorado Fiscal Institute (CFI) a left-leaning think tank, is a key player in this battle, authoring s everal...

Insulin cap in Colorado

In the United States, the topic of medication prices has increased substantially, specifically insulin. Insulin is a medication used to treat type one Diabetes which typically costs a thousand dollars or more depending on how much you need, and how much your insurance is willing to pay. Colorado changed this with a bill designed to put a cap on the copay for insulin. The bill HB19-1216 was signed into law by Governor Jared Polis in May of 2019. This bill states that “a carrier that provides coverage for prescription insulin drugs pursuant to the terms of a health coverage plan the carrier offers shall cap the total amount that a covered person is required to pay for a covered prescription insulin drug at an amount not to exceed one hundred dollars per thirty-day supply of insulin, regardless of the amount of type of insulin needed to fill the covered person’s prescription.” This bill will go into effect on January 1st, 2020 and will be overseen by the department of law who will investi...