Skip to main content

The Endangered Species Act and the Trump Administration



The Endangered Species Act of 1973 has been one of the most controversial environmental topics. Michael J. Bean, discusses the Act’s history as well as going into greater detail on how it works in the world of policy in his journal article, “The Endangered Species Act Science, Policy, and Politics.”  This article discusses how the Endangered Species Act works and how animals and plants are selected for listing on the endangered species list. The Endangered Species Act is a Federal law and the Federal Government is responsible for funding states that are capable of providing the protection for the animals and plants on the list. The act is enforced by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service. The Act was signed on December 28, 1973, by then President Richard Nixon.
In order for animals and plants to be placed on the list  they must fall into these specific categories; over utilization for commercial, scientific, or educational purposes, possible diseases, the destruction of its habitat, or other man made factors as well as natural causes affecting its existence. The International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources as well as the Endangered Species Act decide specifically what vertebrate and invertebrate species is currently and will be on the list. Once on the list the species must be listed as either endangered or threatened. “Endangered” means a species is in danger of extinction where “Threatened” means a species is likely to become endangered.   

The job of the States and the Federal Government is to protect these endangered or threatened species by keeping them alive but also to attempt to recover the species so that they do not need to be protected by the Act.
On August 13, 2019, the United States Trump Administration stated that they will be reconstructing the Endangered Species Act of 1973. These changes included were viewed as  not automatically giving new endangered species full protection under the act, as well as interjecting political, economic, consideration for the listing of species, that should really only be a science based decision.
The United States Congress introduced legislation to block the Trump administration's changes to the Act. H.R. 4348 The PAW and FIN Act of 2019 (Protect America's Wildlife and Fish in Need of protection), and is being led by Senator Tom Udall of New Mexico, and House Natural Resources Committee Chairman, Raul Grijalva of Arizona and two other Democratic Representatives;  Beyer,and Dingell. This Act would rescind the rules the Trump administration used to reduce protections under the Endangered Species Act.

Representative Grijalva said in a statement. “If we don’t stop the Trump administration’s short-sighted rollbacks, more wildlife habitats will be sacrificed to oil and gas development.”  However, Gary Frazer, assistant director for endangered species at U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, the agency responsible for approving listings under the Endangered Species Act stated, “
“We just took advantage of this administration to do a more comprehensive review of our regulations than we have done in the past. But it’s an ongoing job to keep this act and our implementing regulations current and reflective of the needs that species have and the public expects.”  
H.R. 4348 was introduced to House of Representatives September 17, 2019 where it was referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources and the Subcommittee on  Water, Oceans and Wildlife. As of September 24, 2019, it is subcommittee hearings were being held in regards to H.R. 4348 and no further action on the bill has been listed.







 Sources: 
Grijalva, and Raul M. “Actions - H.R.4348 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): PAW and FIN Conservation Act of 2019.” Congress.gov, 24 Sept. 2019, www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4348/all-actions?actionsSearchResultViewType=compact&overview=closed.
Fears, Darryl. “Endangered Species Act Stripped of Key Provisions in Trump Administration Proposal.” The Washington Post, WP Company, 1 Apr. 2019, www.washingtonpost.com/news/animalia/wp/2018/07/19/endangered-species-act-stripped-of-key-provisions-in-trump-administration-proposal/.
Rice, Doyle. “Trump Administration Overhauls Endangered Species Act as Critics Fear Animal Extinction.” USA Today, Gannett Satellite Information Network, 13 Aug. 2019, www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/08/12/donald-trump-administration-weaken-endangered-species-act/1985543001/.
Blakemore, Erin. “How We Decide Which Animals Become Endangered.” Smithsonian.com, Smithsonian Institution, 14 Oct. 2015, www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/how-we-decide-which-animals-become-endangered-180956923/.
“House and Senate Introduce Bills Blocking Trump's Endangered Species Act Reg Rollbacks.” Earthjustice, 17 Sept. 2019, earthjustice.org/news/press/2019/endangered-species-act-house-and-senate-bill-to-block-trump-rollbacks.
Resnick, Brian. “How the Trump Administration Wants to Weaken the Endangered Species Act.” Vox, Vox, 23 July 2018, www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/7/20/17594908/endangered-species-act-trump-proposal-change-weaken.





Comments

  1. Kaylin BrooksOctober 21, 2019 at 10:21 PM

    Thanks for sharing this legislative news! I had no idea that this was a proposed bill and as someone who cares about the environment, I am really intrigued! My concern with this bill is that it may not make it any further through the process, due to extreme polarization sadly. Since Trump has already tried to cut down the grasp of the ESA, I wonder if his fellow Republicans will also take that stance and not support this new proposed? However, maybe it will end up having bipartisan support in congress, like the legislation discussed in the Dirt Bag Diaries podcast.

    ReplyDelete
  2. LauraOctober 22, 2019 at 5:56 PM

    Rylie, your post has informed me a lot about what is going on with the Endangered Species Act. It is unfortunate that this has not been covered much by the media. I agree with your point on how such bill needs scientific reasoning behind it and not political reasoning. It is also unfortunate that we have become so polarized and may not agree on how to address this issue anytime soon.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gun Control in Colorado

Due to the prevalence of mass shootings in the United States, many states have adapted gun legislation to target the issue. Colorado is no exception. The House Bill 1177 or more commonly known as “the red flag bill” was passed this previous legislative session (Aguilar). The bill allows the court to seize firearms from individuals who are deemed a threat to themselves or to others (Aguilar). This considerable gun legislation is significant for Democrats who have advocated for gun control for years. More importantly, the passing of this bill may once again demonstrate which party has been gaining momentum in Colorado these past few years. Colorado’s legislature has generally sided to the left in recent times (Strayer 141). This is a significant shift from the more Republican leaning legislature that Colorado was previously used to (Strayer 141). Furthermore, Colorado’s House Bill 1177 is in no way addressing the issue in a very unique way. Figure 1 below demonstrates nationwide...
6 comments
Read more

Insulin cap in Colorado

In the United States, the topic of medication prices has increased substantially, specifically insulin. Insulin is a medication used to treat type one Diabetes which typically costs a thousand dollars or more depending on how much you need, and how much your insurance is willing to pay. Colorado changed this with a bill designed to put a cap on the copay for insulin. The bill HB19-1216 was signed into law by Governor Jared Polis in May of 2019. This bill states that “a carrier that provides coverage for prescription insulin drugs pursuant to the terms of a health coverage plan the carrier offers shall cap the total amount that a covered person is required to pay for a covered prescription insulin drug at an amount not to exceed one hundred dollars per thirty-day supply of insulin, regardless of the amount of type of insulin needed to fill the covered person’s prescription.” This bill will go into effect on January 1st, 2020 and will be overseen by the department of law who will investi...
7 comments
Read more

TABOR and Colorado Politics Post-CC

       One of the more contentious topics within Colorado politics is budgeting and funding for projects, education, and revenue intake. This came to a head in this year's election with Proposition CC. Despite failing at the ballot box, the Democratic Party is pushing ahead with the 2020 legislative agenda that includes drafts to eliminate the Tax Payer's Bill of Rights or amend it to ensure more accessible revenue for the party's policy objectives. What is critical to the debate is the increasing partisan divide within Colorado, the historical shift from Republican control to Democrat trifectas in state government, and the institutional mechanisms that have hampered strategy for the dominant party. Also, in the mix are interest groups that influence local politics which can help uncover party strategy from another perspective.        The Colorado Fiscal Institute (CFI) a left-leaning think tank, is a key player in this battle, authoring s everal...
6 comments
Read more