Skip to main content

The Endangered Species Act and the Trump Administration



The Endangered Species Act of 1973 has been one of the most controversial environmental topics. Michael J. Bean, discusses the Act’s history as well as going into greater detail on how it works in the world of policy in his journal article, “The Endangered Species Act Science, Policy, and Politics.”  This article discusses how the Endangered Species Act works and how animals and plants are selected for listing on the endangered species list. The Endangered Species Act is a Federal law and the Federal Government is responsible for funding states that are capable of providing the protection for the animals and plants on the list. The act is enforced by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service. The Act was signed on December 28, 1973, by then President Richard Nixon.
In order for animals and plants to be placed on the list  they must fall into these specific categories; over utilization for commercial, scientific, or educational purposes, possible diseases, the destruction of its habitat, or other man made factors as well as natural causes affecting its existence. The International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources as well as the Endangered Species Act decide specifically what vertebrate and invertebrate species is currently and will be on the list. Once on the list the species must be listed as either endangered or threatened. “Endangered” means a species is in danger of extinction where “Threatened” means a species is likely to become endangered.   

The job of the States and the Federal Government is to protect these endangered or threatened species by keeping them alive but also to attempt to recover the species so that they do not need to be protected by the Act.
On August 13, 2019, the United States Trump Administration stated that they will be reconstructing the Endangered Species Act of 1973. These changes included were viewed as  not automatically giving new endangered species full protection under the act, as well as interjecting political, economic, consideration for the listing of species, that should really only be a science based decision.
The United States Congress introduced legislation to block the Trump administration's changes to the Act. H.R. 4348 The PAW and FIN Act of 2019 (Protect America's Wildlife and Fish in Need of protection), and is being led by Senator Tom Udall of New Mexico, and House Natural Resources Committee Chairman, Raul Grijalva of Arizona and two other Democratic Representatives;  Beyer,and Dingell. This Act would rescind the rules the Trump administration used to reduce protections under the Endangered Species Act.

Representative Grijalva said in a statement. “If we don’t stop the Trump administration’s short-sighted rollbacks, more wildlife habitats will be sacrificed to oil and gas development.”  However, Gary Frazer, assistant director for endangered species at U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, the agency responsible for approving listings under the Endangered Species Act stated, “
“We just took advantage of this administration to do a more comprehensive review of our regulations than we have done in the past. But it’s an ongoing job to keep this act and our implementing regulations current and reflective of the needs that species have and the public expects.”  
H.R. 4348 was introduced to House of Representatives September 17, 2019 where it was referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources and the Subcommittee on  Water, Oceans and Wildlife. As of September 24, 2019, it is subcommittee hearings were being held in regards to H.R. 4348 and no further action on the bill has been listed.







 Sources: 
Grijalva, and Raul M. “Actions - H.R.4348 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): PAW and FIN Conservation Act of 2019.” Congress.gov, 24 Sept. 2019, www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4348/all-actions?actionsSearchResultViewType=compact&overview=closed.
Fears, Darryl. “Endangered Species Act Stripped of Key Provisions in Trump Administration Proposal.” The Washington Post, WP Company, 1 Apr. 2019, www.washingtonpost.com/news/animalia/wp/2018/07/19/endangered-species-act-stripped-of-key-provisions-in-trump-administration-proposal/.
Rice, Doyle. “Trump Administration Overhauls Endangered Species Act as Critics Fear Animal Extinction.” USA Today, Gannett Satellite Information Network, 13 Aug. 2019, www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/08/12/donald-trump-administration-weaken-endangered-species-act/1985543001/.
Blakemore, Erin. “How We Decide Which Animals Become Endangered.” Smithsonian.com, Smithsonian Institution, 14 Oct. 2015, www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/how-we-decide-which-animals-become-endangered-180956923/.
“House and Senate Introduce Bills Blocking Trump's Endangered Species Act Reg Rollbacks.” Earthjustice, 17 Sept. 2019, earthjustice.org/news/press/2019/endangered-species-act-house-and-senate-bill-to-block-trump-rollbacks.
Resnick, Brian. “How the Trump Administration Wants to Weaken the Endangered Species Act.” Vox, Vox, 23 July 2018, www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/7/20/17594908/endangered-species-act-trump-proposal-change-weaken.





Comments

  1. Kaylin BrooksOctober 21, 2019 at 10:21 PM

    Thanks for sharing this legislative news! I had no idea that this was a proposed bill and as someone who cares about the environment, I am really intrigued! My concern with this bill is that it may not make it any further through the process, due to extreme polarization sadly. Since Trump has already tried to cut down the grasp of the ESA, I wonder if his fellow Republicans will also take that stance and not support this new proposed? However, maybe it will end up having bipartisan support in congress, like the legislation discussed in the Dirt Bag Diaries podcast.

    ReplyDelete
  2. LauraOctober 22, 2019 at 5:56 PM

    Rylie, your post has informed me a lot about what is going on with the Endangered Species Act. It is unfortunate that this has not been covered much by the media. I agree with your point on how such bill needs scientific reasoning behind it and not political reasoning. It is also unfortunate that we have become so polarized and may not agree on how to address this issue anytime soon.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Ballot Initiative in Colorado

    One of the most distinctive features of the legislative process in Colorado is the prevalence of the ballot initiative. In the election this November, voters had the opportunity to approve their own laws. One of these laws included a proposition that would legalize sports betting.     This is not the first time that voters have had the ability to make hugely influential decisions. Voters have voted to legalize marijuana. In Colorado, they even approve tax increases because of the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, or TABOR. This means that, unlike in other states, Colorado voters have legislative power of their own.      One of these most recent initiatives involved sports betting. Colorado would legalize sports betting, but sports betting would be taxed. This revenue would be used to fund plans to address Colorado's water problem. However, according to the Colorado Sun, the money from sports betting will not generate any money to address these water iss...
Post a Comment
Read more

TABOR & Proposition CC: Providing Context to Colorado's Tax Problem

Edward Baisley Prof. Matthew Hitt POLS 304 Dec. 2019 Blog Post 3 (TABOR and Proposition CC) Colorado's tax system is very unique in comparison to pretty much every other state in the U.S. Arguably the biggest aspect of the tax system that is unique is the amendment to the Colorado Constitution known as TABOR or the Tax Payers Bill of Rights. This amendment which was drafted into law in 1992, has many implications for Colorado's state and local governments. One of the main implications is that TABOR requires the state and local governments of Colorado to acquire voter approval before any tax increase can be implemented. Some other more less known implications are detailed by Denver Post author Anna Staver, she explains that TABOR: “ Limits how many tax dollars governments can keep … It’s called the TABOR cap, anything a government collects above the cap gets returned as a TABOR tax refund … (TABOR) Limits when lawmakers can ask voters to raise taxe...
1 comment
Read more

The Flawed American Electoral System

A free and fair election is one that is inclusive to all of the population. A democratic state requires active citizen participation to ensure equal representation. The framers of the constitution originally wanted the United States government to only be governed by educated white men. It was not until 1920 that the 19th amendment was passed that allowed white females to vote in America. Then it was not until the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that allowed African-Americans the right to vote freely. There were many amendments and reforms throughout history that has changed our election system. Different changes to state election process will ensure an equitable election system. This is a highly debated legislative issue that goes back and forth for the past decade and into the 2020 election. It is crucial for such a powerful and free country to protect its proud democratic values.  There are still issues with the American election systems. There are a lot of holes in represe...
1 comment
Read more