Skip to main content

Is Speaker Pelosi Being Fair about Trump’s Impeachment Process?


            The House of Representatives has recently taken the bold move of proceeding impeaching the United States President. The House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, has come forward saying the House is moving forward with an official inquiry on investigating President Trump’s suspicious phone call with the President of Ukraine.
The large question at play is should the Speaker be required to have an official vote on the impeachment inquiry into President Trump? From a CNN article, Pelosi believes a vote is not necessary and it would take too much time to officially write up (Herb). Many Republicans have come forward arguing yes, we need a vote and many Democrats have been arguing no, we do not (Herb). Ultimately, this issue comes down to how the rules of the House are set up. In this case, Pelosi is right, officially the House rules don’t require a vote, so legally it does not need to happen (Herb). However, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy told Pelosi to “suspend the impeachment inquiry until equitable rules and procedures are established” and yet Pelosi still won’t budge (Herb).
Many are asking is this fair? Some are claiming that a vote to officially start impeachment wouldn’t even really matter because, the Democrats have the majority in the House already and many of them support the inquiry. However, the White House is claiming that the President’s rights are being taken away with no official vote taking place (Herb). The White House even stated they will not cooperate with the continuing of this inquiry if House Democrats don’t change the process.
            However, Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi has a large list of tasks to balance and with ever increasing polarization it makes sense for her to do what’s best for her party. From the article, Mischiefs of Faction called “Evaluating the Pelosi Speakership,” author Green argues that the Speaker has “the worst job in Washington.” Green argues that the main issues come from massive division in the country, that which makes it hard to lead the entire House and also represent your own party’s agenda. The article also explains that the Speaker’s goal is to “protect your majority,” and in this case Pelosi is protecting her party by not allowing a vote. She is attempting to keep the majority and do what her party thinks is best. Another fact that Green brings up is the “importance for speakers of maximizing their support among fellow partisans” (Green). This graph below from a New York Times article called “Complete List: Who Supports an Impeachment Inquiry Against Trump?” shows how many members of Congress want to start the impeachment inquiry on Trump.

This graph shows that almost all the Democrats in the House support Impeachment. For the Speaker, this is a cue to what her party wants. Even if Pelosi thought an official vote was fair, her fellow Democrats may think this is too much of a compromise or giving too much power to Republicans. If Pelosi’s other democrats didn’t trust her or if the party lost unity, then that could look bad for the Speaker and for the party, since her ultimate job is to keep the party majority strong.

Also, from book, The United States Congress by Adler, Jenkin, and Shipan they state that the “majority party priorities have largely defined the legislative agenda” and “partisan polarization still remains at an all-time high” (Adler et al. 233). Thus, this gives us more understanding as to why Pelosi is not budging on having a vote. Each party is highly polarized and won’t want to compromise in anyway. Plus, since the Democrats control the House, they have the ability to have high control and call the shots.
To some it may not be fair that Republicans most likely won’t get to vote on whether or not to continue the Trump impeachment inquiry. This is all due to major polarization, majority party rule, and a system that falls harshly on the minority party. However, in this country where this type of politics doesn’t appear to be changing, it seems almost understandable and reasonable how Speaker Pelosi is acting.

Sources:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/08/politics/nancy-pelosi-letter-impeachment/index.html
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/us/politics/trump-impeachment-congress-list.html
Matthew N. Green, “Evaluating the Pelosi Speakership”, Mischiefs of Faction
Adler, E. Scott, et al. The United States Congress. W.W. Norton & Company, 2019.

Comments

  1. LauraOctober 22, 2019 at 5:09 PM

    Kaylin, your input on where we are current with the impeachment process was very informative. As you mentioned, the reading "Evaluation the Pelosi Speakership" emphasized how the #1 goal for the majority party speaker is to protect the parties' majority. It will be interesting to see how the impeachment inquiry plays out during the next election.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Proposition DD: Let the Bets Flow

On November 5 th , 2019, one of the two measures placed on the ballot in Colorado was Proposition DD, giving the electorate a referendum on the legality of sports betting within the state; it also would impose a tax upon the net revenue of those establishments accepting such bets, the majority of which would provide funding for the Colorado Water Plan and the remainder of which would be used to regulate sports betting and provide services for gambling addiction. Since 1992, gambling on the outcome of most sporting events had been outlawed nationally under the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, or PASPA, though with the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association , this Act was deemed unconstitutional, and state legislatures became free to legislate regarding sports betting and its legality. Proposition DD was put to a public ballot under the provisions of the TABOR amendment to the Colorado Constitution, a ‘Taxpayer Bill of Rights’ ...
2 comments
Read more

The Proponents of Proposition DD

Proposition DD and its proponents One of the most significant and noteworthy results of the recent elections in Colorado was the passing of Proposition DD. A legislative proposition is a proposal placed on the ballot by the state legislature itself. The legislature in Denver referred the measure with House Bill 1327 during the spring season, with easy bipartisan support. [1] The proposition however did not receive such widespread support from the public, only narrowly passing, and being too close to call on election night. This is illustrated below. [2] The passage of Proposition DD legalised gambling on sports events, beginning in six months’ time; making Colorado the nineteenth state to legalise sports betting. Colorado’s seventeen casino operators will be eligible to apply for licenses for both physical and online sportsbooks, with the Colorado Division of Gaming being tasked to regulate the market. [3] ‘Yes on Proposition DD’ raised about $2.83 million for ca...
Post a Comment
Read more

Immigration Visas and Polarization

Megan King  The story I decided to investigate in National News is , “ Federal Judges Block Trump Policy Targeting Legal Immigrants on Public Benefits ” by Claire Hansen demonstrates how difficult the policymaking procedure can be. In regard to the separations of powers, this ideology does give each branch equal representation, which in this case was to block a new policy. In this situation, three judges filed lawsuits because the new policy the Government was going to implement that visas could be denied if they think that immigrants who are going to use public benefits. It is known as the “public charge” policy which is basically, “any individual who is deemed likely to accept a benefit is considered a public charger” which was just another attempt from the Trump Administration desiring to stop immigration (Hansen). There has already been policies in place that set up circumstances that Immigration Courts and the Government have set up to deny immigration residence just in...
2 comments
Read more