Skip to main content

Gerrymandering

Gerrymandering is the drawing of political district boundaries in order to gain an advantage to a specific political party. This idea began when former Governor of Massachusetts, Elbridge Gerry, signed a bill that re-drew the district lines in Massachusetts election districts in order to favor the Democratic-Republican party he was a part of. The district that was created resembled a salamander, hence the name Gerrymandering. Over the years, congressional districts have become required to abide by “certain features and desirable qualities.” These qualities include factors like compactness, contiguity or assuring the district is connected, population, partisan fairness, and racial fairness (Adler, 2019). 
There are two main types of gerrymandering called packing and cracking that both play a part in diminishing their opponents' voting power. Packing is essentially when a political parties voting power is concentrated in one congressional district in order to reduce their voting power in other districts. By reducing the voting power of one party in multiple districts, the party that is doing the packing can win more districts and, in theory, win the election.
Cracking is a different strategy used to decrease the voting power of a political party by splitting up their supporters among many districts. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was enacted to stop states from discriminating based on race and gerrymandering around certain minority groups. It stopped “cracking” or splitting up racial minority groups in order to ensure everyone got equal voting power. 
Racial gerrymandering is another form of redrawing electoral districts, but it is done to dilute the voting power of certain groups of people. This isn’t a “coincidental side effect of general gerrymandering, but an intentional attempt to suppress the votes of racial minorities” (Fiorillo, 2018).  In 1990, the Justice Department used the Voting Rights Act to “maximize the number of majority-minority districts in which a majority of constituents are non-white (Adler, 2019). This racial gerrymandering was, in legal terms stopped due to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, but arguably still happens today and is very likely to be seen again (Adler, 2019). 
The pictures shown above give a visual of how gerrymandering works. The left shows some of the most gerrymandered districts in the country. As you can see these districts go all over the place in order to include or exclude certain voters in an effort to win more districts and therefore, elections. The picture on the right gives a simpler explanation of how gerrymandering can influence elections. If the districts were split up evenly, as in the second graph, then the yellow party would always win. The third graph is gerrymandered giving the green party a slight advantage but still loses to the yellow party. The fourth and fifth graphs really show how influential gerrymandering can be to elections. The green still has a strong disadvantage to the yellow party, but because of gerrymandering, the green was able to win the majority of the districts. 
While multiple supreme court cases have tried to stop or change the way districts are gerrymandered, it still happens today. This process often turns citizens away from voting due to the chance that the popular vote and the electoral college vote are not aligned. Because of this misrepresentation, one of the most valuable aspects of American democracy is in jeopardy, which, in my opinion, needs to be effectively changed. 
Works Cited
Duignan, Brian. “Gerrymandering.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 11 Oct. 2019, www.britannica.com/topic/gerrymandering.
Ingraham, Christopher. “America's Most Gerrymandered Congressional Districts.” The Washington Post, WP Company, 26 Apr. 2019, www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/05/15/americas-most-gerrymandered-congressional-districts/. 
Fiorillo, Steve. “Gerrymandering: Definition, History and Legality in 2018.” TheStreet, 2 Dec. 2018, www.thestreet.com/politics/what-is-gerrymandering-14796491. 

Adler, E. Scott, Jeffrey A. Jenkins, and Charles R. Shipan. 2019. The United States Congress. New York: Norton. ISBN 978-0-393-68019-5.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Insulin cap in Colorado

In the United States, the topic of medication prices has increased substantially, specifically insulin. Insulin is a medication used to treat type one Diabetes which typically costs a thousand dollars or more depending on how much you need, and how much your insurance is willing to pay. Colorado changed this with a bill designed to put a cap on the copay for insulin. The bill HB19-1216 was signed into law by Governor Jared Polis in May of 2019. This bill states that “a carrier that provides coverage for prescription insulin drugs pursuant to the terms of a health coverage plan the carrier offers shall cap the total amount that a covered person is required to pay for a covered prescription insulin drug at an amount not to exceed one hundred dollars per thirty-day supply of insulin, regardless of the amount of type of insulin needed to fill the covered person’s prescription.” This bill will go into effect on January 1st, 2020 and will be overseen by the department of law who will investi...
7 comments
Read more

Gun Control in Colorado

Due to the prevalence of mass shootings in the United States, many states have adapted gun legislation to target the issue. Colorado is no exception. The House Bill 1177 or more commonly known as “the red flag bill” was passed this previous legislative session (Aguilar). The bill allows the court to seize firearms from individuals who are deemed a threat to themselves or to others (Aguilar). This considerable gun legislation is significant for Democrats who have advocated for gun control for years. More importantly, the passing of this bill may once again demonstrate which party has been gaining momentum in Colorado these past few years. Colorado’s legislature has generally sided to the left in recent times (Strayer 141). This is a significant shift from the more Republican leaning legislature that Colorado was previously used to (Strayer 141). Furthermore, Colorado’s House Bill 1177 is in no way addressing the issue in a very unique way. Figure 1 below demonstrates nationwide...
6 comments
Read more

TABOR and Colorado Politics Post-CC

       One of the more contentious topics within Colorado politics is budgeting and funding for projects, education, and revenue intake. This came to a head in this year's election with Proposition CC. Despite failing at the ballot box, the Democratic Party is pushing ahead with the 2020 legislative agenda that includes drafts to eliminate the Tax Payer's Bill of Rights or amend it to ensure more accessible revenue for the party's policy objectives. What is critical to the debate is the increasing partisan divide within Colorado, the historical shift from Republican control to Democrat trifectas in state government, and the institutional mechanisms that have hampered strategy for the dominant party. Also, in the mix are interest groups that influence local politics which can help uncover party strategy from another perspective.        The Colorado Fiscal Institute (CFI) a left-leaning think tank, is a key player in this battle, authoring s everal...
6 comments
Read more