Skip to main content

Gerrymandering

Gerrymandering is the drawing of political district boundaries in order to gain an advantage to a specific political party. This idea began when former Governor of Massachusetts, Elbridge Gerry, signed a bill that re-drew the district lines in Massachusetts election districts in order to favor the Democratic-Republican party he was a part of. The district that was created resembled a salamander, hence the name Gerrymandering. Over the years, congressional districts have become required to abide by “certain features and desirable qualities.” These qualities include factors like compactness, contiguity or assuring the district is connected, population, partisan fairness, and racial fairness (Adler, 2019). 
There are two main types of gerrymandering called packing and cracking that both play a part in diminishing their opponents' voting power. Packing is essentially when a political parties voting power is concentrated in one congressional district in order to reduce their voting power in other districts. By reducing the voting power of one party in multiple districts, the party that is doing the packing can win more districts and, in theory, win the election.
Cracking is a different strategy used to decrease the voting power of a political party by splitting up their supporters among many districts. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was enacted to stop states from discriminating based on race and gerrymandering around certain minority groups. It stopped “cracking” or splitting up racial minority groups in order to ensure everyone got equal voting power. 
Racial gerrymandering is another form of redrawing electoral districts, but it is done to dilute the voting power of certain groups of people. This isn’t a “coincidental side effect of general gerrymandering, but an intentional attempt to suppress the votes of racial minorities” (Fiorillo, 2018).  In 1990, the Justice Department used the Voting Rights Act to “maximize the number of majority-minority districts in which a majority of constituents are non-white (Adler, 2019). This racial gerrymandering was, in legal terms stopped due to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, but arguably still happens today and is very likely to be seen again (Adler, 2019). 
The pictures shown above give a visual of how gerrymandering works. The left shows some of the most gerrymandered districts in the country. As you can see these districts go all over the place in order to include or exclude certain voters in an effort to win more districts and therefore, elections. The picture on the right gives a simpler explanation of how gerrymandering can influence elections. If the districts were split up evenly, as in the second graph, then the yellow party would always win. The third graph is gerrymandered giving the green party a slight advantage but still loses to the yellow party. The fourth and fifth graphs really show how influential gerrymandering can be to elections. The green still has a strong disadvantage to the yellow party, but because of gerrymandering, the green was able to win the majority of the districts. 
While multiple supreme court cases have tried to stop or change the way districts are gerrymandered, it still happens today. This process often turns citizens away from voting due to the chance that the popular vote and the electoral college vote are not aligned. Because of this misrepresentation, one of the most valuable aspects of American democracy is in jeopardy, which, in my opinion, needs to be effectively changed. 
Works Cited
Duignan, Brian. “Gerrymandering.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 11 Oct. 2019, www.britannica.com/topic/gerrymandering.
Ingraham, Christopher. “America's Most Gerrymandered Congressional Districts.” The Washington Post, WP Company, 26 Apr. 2019, www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/05/15/americas-most-gerrymandered-congressional-districts/. 
Fiorillo, Steve. “Gerrymandering: Definition, History and Legality in 2018.” TheStreet, 2 Dec. 2018, www.thestreet.com/politics/what-is-gerrymandering-14796491. 

Adler, E. Scott, Jeffrey A. Jenkins, and Charles R. Shipan. 2019. The United States Congress. New York: Norton. ISBN 978-0-393-68019-5.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Ballot Initiative in Colorado

    One of the most distinctive features of the legislative process in Colorado is the prevalence of the ballot initiative. In the election this November, voters had the opportunity to approve their own laws. One of these laws included a proposition that would legalize sports betting.     This is not the first time that voters have had the ability to make hugely influential decisions. Voters have voted to legalize marijuana. In Colorado, they even approve tax increases because of the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, or TABOR. This means that, unlike in other states, Colorado voters have legislative power of their own.      One of these most recent initiatives involved sports betting. Colorado would legalize sports betting, but sports betting would be taxed. This revenue would be used to fund plans to address Colorado's water problem. However, according to the Colorado Sun, the money from sports betting will not generate any money to address these water iss...
Post a Comment
Read more

TABOR & Proposition CC: Providing Context to Colorado's Tax Problem

Edward Baisley Prof. Matthew Hitt POLS 304 Dec. 2019 Blog Post 3 (TABOR and Proposition CC) Colorado's tax system is very unique in comparison to pretty much every other state in the U.S. Arguably the biggest aspect of the tax system that is unique is the amendment to the Colorado Constitution known as TABOR or the Tax Payers Bill of Rights. This amendment which was drafted into law in 1992, has many implications for Colorado's state and local governments. One of the main implications is that TABOR requires the state and local governments of Colorado to acquire voter approval before any tax increase can be implemented. Some other more less known implications are detailed by Denver Post author Anna Staver, she explains that TABOR: “ Limits how many tax dollars governments can keep … It’s called the TABOR cap, anything a government collects above the cap gets returned as a TABOR tax refund … (TABOR) Limits when lawmakers can ask voters to raise taxe...
1 comment
Read more

The Flawed American Electoral System

A free and fair election is one that is inclusive to all of the population. A democratic state requires active citizen participation to ensure equal representation. The framers of the constitution originally wanted the United States government to only be governed by educated white men. It was not until 1920 that the 19th amendment was passed that allowed white females to vote in America. Then it was not until the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that allowed African-Americans the right to vote freely. There were many amendments and reforms throughout history that has changed our election system. Different changes to state election process will ensure an equitable election system. This is a highly debated legislative issue that goes back and forth for the past decade and into the 2020 election. It is crucial for such a powerful and free country to protect its proud democratic values.  There are still issues with the American election systems. There are a lot of holes in represe...
1 comment
Read more