Skip to main content

Activision Blizzard and The First Amendment

Colten Dudley
Prof. Matthew Hitt
Blog Post 2
October 16, 2019


Activision Blizzard and The First Amendment
As a member of the video gaming community in the United States, the past few weeks have been particularly odd. Activision Blizzard, a publishing parent company for both Activision and Blizzard (apparently smashing the names together makes a new company), is under heavy fire after an esports contestant “Blitzchung” voiced his support for the protests going on in Hong Kong. The winner of the video game competition lost all of his expected payouts, roughly 10,000 dollars in tournament winnings, and banned him from playing in another competition for over a year. In addition to this, the esports casters were fired from their jobs for simply sharing the screen with the player while he voiced his support for Hong Kong. 
This has caused fairly severe outrage amongst American Consumers, who see this movement made by Activision Blizzard as censorship of Free Speech made in favor of appeasing the Chinese Government, as the Chinese market for video games is a sort of ‘Holy Grail” for publishers. In the blog post announcing Blitzchung's ban, Blizzard said "we stand by one's right to express individual thoughts and opinions," but Blitzchung's comments were considered to be too harmful to the company. 
These events beg the question; should American companies violate the norms and laws on their country to appease another? These events come post NBA controversy, where an executive with the Houston Rockets voiced his support for Hong Kong protestors, infuriating Chinese fans and leading to major backpedaling on behalf of the NBA to appease the Chinese Government. However, as the gaming market grows, It is clear why companies are making the choice to appease China.  A Newzoo forecast predicted that Asian-Pacific regions will make up 47% of all consumer spending on games, and if these games don't meet Chinese standards, they won’t be sold to that area. 
The market is massive in China, so it is obvious that companies would want to take advantage of that. But when American Companies are outright censoring free speech in order to secure a dollar, American consumers become concerned.
This situation will continue to play out in the coming weeks, as Developers associated with these publishers voice their own distaste for Activision Blizzard’s actions. The legality of their actions is being called into question, and should have members of the United States constituency thinking about the companies that they support and the intentions that each of those companies have. This case could come to surface in future political news as tensions rise and American companies continue to support an oppressive Government overseas for a buck.
















Sources
Victor, Daniel. “Hong Kong Protests Put N.B.A. on Edge in China.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 7 Oct. 2019, www.nytimes.com/2019/10/07/sports/basketball/nba-china-hong-kong.html.
Webb, Kevin. “Here's a Timeline of Activision Blizzard's Terrible Week, as It Faces Fan Protests after an Esports Athlete Was Punished for Voicing Support for Hong Kong.” Business Insider, Business Insider, 12 Oct. 2019,
Wilson, Jason. “Newzoo: U.S. Will Overtake China as No. 1 Gaming Market in 2019.” VentureBeat, VentureBeat, 21 June 2019, venturebeat.com/2019/06/18/newzoo-u-s-will-overtake-china-as-no-1-gaming-market-in-2019/.




Comments

  1. KaitlynAndersonOctober 22, 2019 at 11:41 AM

    This issue is very interesting. I had heard about the issue with the NBA last week from one of my other political science classes. I agree with you that it is concerning that companies like this are trying to make money by appealing to the Chinese audience. I do not think that it is right for companies or the government to oppress the first amendment right of companies that choose to voice support for issues like this whether it is to make money or not.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Turner ChangOctober 23, 2019 at 8:06 PM

    I have been watching this issue and ones similar where Chinese regulations are affecting how American companies operate and i find this very troublesome. This corrupts our businesses forcing them to adhere to Chinese laws or lose out on billions of dollars in profit. I feel that this will become a more mainstream issue soon because with so much Chinese influence in our economy hopefully our government wont follow suit.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Eric KrawczykOctober 24, 2019 at 1:50 AM

    Very interesting topic and a good job connecting esports into the political topic. I had heard about the NBA problem before, but the esports connection was an interesting take. It will be very interesting to see how the Hong Kong situation takes place and if congress will interfere.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Ballot Initiative in Colorado

    One of the most distinctive features of the legislative process in Colorado is the prevalence of the ballot initiative. In the election this November, voters had the opportunity to approve their own laws. One of these laws included a proposition that would legalize sports betting.     This is not the first time that voters have had the ability to make hugely influential decisions. Voters have voted to legalize marijuana. In Colorado, they even approve tax increases because of the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, or TABOR. This means that, unlike in other states, Colorado voters have legislative power of their own.      One of these most recent initiatives involved sports betting. Colorado would legalize sports betting, but sports betting would be taxed. This revenue would be used to fund plans to address Colorado's water problem. However, according to the Colorado Sun, the money from sports betting will not generate any money to address these water iss...
Post a Comment
Read more

TABOR & Proposition CC: Providing Context to Colorado's Tax Problem

Edward Baisley Prof. Matthew Hitt POLS 304 Dec. 2019 Blog Post 3 (TABOR and Proposition CC) Colorado's tax system is very unique in comparison to pretty much every other state in the U.S. Arguably the biggest aspect of the tax system that is unique is the amendment to the Colorado Constitution known as TABOR or the Tax Payers Bill of Rights. This amendment which was drafted into law in 1992, has many implications for Colorado's state and local governments. One of the main implications is that TABOR requires the state and local governments of Colorado to acquire voter approval before any tax increase can be implemented. Some other more less known implications are detailed by Denver Post author Anna Staver, she explains that TABOR: “ Limits how many tax dollars governments can keep … It’s called the TABOR cap, anything a government collects above the cap gets returned as a TABOR tax refund … (TABOR) Limits when lawmakers can ask voters to raise taxe...
1 comment
Read more

The Flawed American Electoral System

A free and fair election is one that is inclusive to all of the population. A democratic state requires active citizen participation to ensure equal representation. The framers of the constitution originally wanted the United States government to only be governed by educated white men. It was not until 1920 that the 19th amendment was passed that allowed white females to vote in America. Then it was not until the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that allowed African-Americans the right to vote freely. There were many amendments and reforms throughout history that has changed our election system. Different changes to state election process will ensure an equitable election system. This is a highly debated legislative issue that goes back and forth for the past decade and into the 2020 election. It is crucial for such a powerful and free country to protect its proud democratic values.  There are still issues with the American election systems. There are a lot of holes in represe...
1 comment
Read more