Skip to main content

The Logistics of Impeachment in The United States

Impeachment is defined as a charge of misconduct made against the holder of a public office. In today's political climate, where we face severe polarization of political parties, we hear a lot about impeachment; specifically the want to impeach our current President, Donald Trump. The accusations splatter all over the target, and I do not wish to analyze the validity or intent of any of these accusations. Instead, I want to look at the process of Impeaching a U.S. President. What would the consequences of impeachment be? How would this affect the United States Today? At this point in the Presidency, is it still valid and, for lack of a better term, worth it to continue to try and impeach President Trump?

All of these questions are extremely broad, but by looking into them, I hope to gather a deeper understanding of the power of impeachment. Alder, Jenkins, and Shipan state that impeachment is "the ultimate power Congress has over the President." Within Article II Section 4 of the Constitution, this power is expressly defined and given to Congress. Essentially, if one holding office is convicted of a crime/ misdemeanor, that person will lose their position in Office. Given the history of the United States, however, Impeachment has never seen someone exiting office on account of conviction. Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson were both impeached by the House Of Representatives, yet remained in office as no conviction was made by the Senate(Adler 339). With today's Polarized government, I believe it would see very little progress to attempt Impeachment, as history has shown that one part of our divided government can allow someone to continue to hold office. This would probably infuriate the public today, as, according to a 2016 Article by The Guardian, the public feels less represented by a government with more extreme leanings. This comes more specifically from the 2016 American Values Survey, which saw that most of their sample of 2,010 adults from all 50 states were more moderate in political affiliation than either Liberal or Conservative. With the "public" (and I use that term loosely) feeling less represented with a polarized Government, that population is less likely to accept the decisions made by the Government that should be representing their state and district Values. 

At this point in the Presidency, it is unlikely that we will see the Impeachment of President Trump. With Democratic Primary Debates already well underway, It is more likely that we will see President Trump lose the re-election than lose his current position. The measure of worth falls on the individual, as it is wildly subjective, but with the ongoing debate of impeachment constantly plaguing our daily news, internet ads, and even local conversations, it is important to understand how effective Impeachment has been in the past and how the United States public may react to Impeachment or the lack thereof.  


Adler, E. Scott, et al. The United States Congress. W.W. Norton & Company, 2019.

Jones, Robert P., Daniel Cox, Betsy Cooper, and Rachel Lienesch. “The Divide Over America’s Future: 1950 or 2050? Findings from the 2016 American Values Survey.” PRRI. 2016.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

TABOR & Proposition CC: Providing Context to Colorado's Tax Problem

Edward Baisley Prof. Matthew Hitt POLS 304 Dec. 2019 Blog Post 3 (TABOR and Proposition CC) Colorado's tax system is very unique in comparison to pretty much every other state in the U.S. Arguably the biggest aspect of the tax system that is unique is the amendment to the Colorado Constitution known as TABOR or the Tax Payers Bill of Rights. This amendment which was drafted into law in 1992, has many implications for Colorado's state and local governments. One of the main implications is that TABOR requires the state and local governments of Colorado to acquire voter approval before any tax increase can be implemented. Some other more less known implications are detailed by Denver Post author Anna Staver, she explains that TABOR: “ Limits how many tax dollars governments can keep … It’s called the TABOR cap, anything a government collects above the cap gets returned as a TABOR tax refund … (TABOR) Limits when lawmakers can ask voters to raise taxe...

The Flawed American Electoral System

A free and fair election is one that is inclusive to all of the population. A democratic state requires active citizen participation to ensure equal representation. The framers of the constitution originally wanted the United States government to only be governed by educated white men. It was not until 1920 that the 19th amendment was passed that allowed white females to vote in America. Then it was not until the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that allowed African-Americans the right to vote freely. There were many amendments and reforms throughout history that has changed our election system. Different changes to state election process will ensure an equitable election system. This is a highly debated legislative issue that goes back and forth for the past decade and into the 2020 election. It is crucial for such a powerful and free country to protect its proud democratic values.  There are still issues with the American election systems. There are a lot of holes in represe...

The Ballot Initiative in Colorado

    One of the most distinctive features of the legislative process in Colorado is the prevalence of the ballot initiative. In the election this November, voters had the opportunity to approve their own laws. One of these laws included a proposition that would legalize sports betting.     This is not the first time that voters have had the ability to make hugely influential decisions. Voters have voted to legalize marijuana. In Colorado, they even approve tax increases because of the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, or TABOR. This means that, unlike in other states, Colorado voters have legislative power of their own.      One of these most recent initiatives involved sports betting. Colorado would legalize sports betting, but sports betting would be taxed. This revenue would be used to fund plans to address Colorado's water problem. However, according to the Colorado Sun, the money from sports betting will not generate any money to address these water iss...