Skip to main content

The Contemporary Issue: Budget Battling


Government spending has always led to issues between parties in the legislative branch but since the Obama Administration, the problem has seemed to escalate, possibly due to our party’s and country’s polarization. The Budget Control Act of 2011 under the Obama administration, “Increase[d] the debt limit in stages through 2012” and “Establishe[d] caps on discretionary spending through 2021.” (Bipartisan Policy Center) This implemented routine spending cuts through to the year 2021. Jump forward to the Trump presidency in late December 2018. This was the beginning of a 34-day government shutdown, something of a record-breaker. 
As described by The Balance, the government shuts down when Congress cannot come to an agreement on bills in order to fund the government for the upcoming fiscal year. (The Balance) In the Trump era, a huge factor in the ‘budget battle’ surrounded the need for increased funding for the wall on the southern border.
The Mexico-American wall was one of the main platforms on which president Trump campaigned for his presidency in 2016. 
While trying to fulfill his promises to his supporters and constituency and acquire the funding, he was faced with opposition from Democratic legislatures. This is feud led to the 2018-2019 historic government shutdown. For the duration of the shutdown, approximately 800,000 federal employees were not given pay and the economic activity was reduced by $3 billion. (Bipartisan Policy Center) After coming to an agreement in February, which reinstates the national debt limit to $22 trillion, President Trump and Congress came to an agreement for the upcoming fiscal year, however “By this point, nearly half of the fiscal year ha[d] already elapsed.” (Bipartisan Policy Center) Through all of this, we see the legislative discord between parties that led up to thousands of people unpaid and the loss of millions in economic circulation. 
Like Professor Hitt stated, are some politicians in office to simply disagree with their opposition or are they working to represent what they’re constituents want?
This is also an issue within the North Carolina district of Cumberland County. In a North Carolina Public Radio interview with Representative Billy Richardson it explains how the “House Democrats want to hold the line in sustaining Gov. Roy Cooper’s budget veto…” (WUNC) The Republicans of the house are trying to convince a small number of Democrats to help pass an override. Journalist Rusty Jacobs asks if Rep. Billy Richardson is for the override. His reply, “No… I have two jobs as a representative. One is to represent the people and the interests of my district… because I live in a district in sore need of many things.” (WUNC) Though a Democrat, Richardson aligns himself with the wants of his opposing party members that being a higher standard for teachers pay and local provisions for disasters. Richardson’s fellow Democrats are aimed towards Medicaid expansion and object cooperate tax cuts (WUNC).  The article explaining the interview goes on later to explain that although he believes in what many of the Republicans are aiming towards, he still may not cross party lines. Richardson states he “is a North Carolinian and an American with a ‘sacred’ responsibility to act in the best interest of his constituents and the people of the state. (WUNC)
Both of these examples show the complexity of budgeting while representing a constituency and what gridlocks can come of it. The economic downfall, while the government is stationary, can be catastrophic on a national level and within small districts. Some politicians may play into the opposition that our bipartisan government is founded upon and some such as Representative Richardson may be trying to act as trustees for those they represent while keeping their political affiliation. 



Citation

Amadeo, Kimberly. “Why the Government Shut Down and What Happens Next.” The Balance. https://www.thebalance.com/government-shutdown-3305683 (September 19, 2019).

“Budget Battles Defining Washington: A Timeline | Bipartisan Policy Center.” https://bipartisanpolicy.org/budget-timeline/ (September 17, 2019).

Jacobs, Rusty. “Democratic Rep. Laments Lack Of Leadership Amid NC Budget Battle.” https://www.wunc.org/post/democratic-rep-laments-lack-leadership-amid-nc-budget-battle (September 17, 2019).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

TABOR & Proposition CC: Providing Context to Colorado's Tax Problem

Edward Baisley Prof. Matthew Hitt POLS 304 Dec. 2019 Blog Post 3 (TABOR and Proposition CC) Colorado's tax system is very unique in comparison to pretty much every other state in the U.S. Arguably the biggest aspect of the tax system that is unique is the amendment to the Colorado Constitution known as TABOR or the Tax Payers Bill of Rights. This amendment which was drafted into law in 1992, has many implications for Colorado's state and local governments. One of the main implications is that TABOR requires the state and local governments of Colorado to acquire voter approval before any tax increase can be implemented. Some other more less known implications are detailed by Denver Post author Anna Staver, she explains that TABOR: “ Limits how many tax dollars governments can keep … It’s called the TABOR cap, anything a government collects above the cap gets returned as a TABOR tax refund … (TABOR) Limits when lawmakers can ask voters to raise taxe...
1 comment
Read more

The Flawed American Electoral System

A free and fair election is one that is inclusive to all of the population. A democratic state requires active citizen participation to ensure equal representation. The framers of the constitution originally wanted the United States government to only be governed by educated white men. It was not until 1920 that the 19th amendment was passed that allowed white females to vote in America. Then it was not until the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that allowed African-Americans the right to vote freely. There were many amendments and reforms throughout history that has changed our election system. Different changes to state election process will ensure an equitable election system. This is a highly debated legislative issue that goes back and forth for the past decade and into the 2020 election. It is crucial for such a powerful and free country to protect its proud democratic values.  There are still issues with the American election systems. There are a lot of holes in represe...
1 comment
Read more

The Ballot Initiative in Colorado

    One of the most distinctive features of the legislative process in Colorado is the prevalence of the ballot initiative. In the election this November, voters had the opportunity to approve their own laws. One of these laws included a proposition that would legalize sports betting.     This is not the first time that voters have had the ability to make hugely influential decisions. Voters have voted to legalize marijuana. In Colorado, they even approve tax increases because of the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, or TABOR. This means that, unlike in other states, Colorado voters have legislative power of their own.      One of these most recent initiatives involved sports betting. Colorado would legalize sports betting, but sports betting would be taxed. This revenue would be used to fund plans to address Colorado's water problem. However, according to the Colorado Sun, the money from sports betting will not generate any money to address these water iss...
Post a Comment
Read more