Skip to main content

The Contemporary Issue: Budget Battling


Government spending has always led to issues between parties in the legislative branch but since the Obama Administration, the problem has seemed to escalate, possibly due to our party’s and country’s polarization. The Budget Control Act of 2011 under the Obama administration, “Increase[d] the debt limit in stages through 2012” and “Establishe[d] caps on discretionary spending through 2021.” (Bipartisan Policy Center) This implemented routine spending cuts through to the year 2021. Jump forward to the Trump presidency in late December 2018. This was the beginning of a 34-day government shutdown, something of a record-breaker. 
As described by The Balance, the government shuts down when Congress cannot come to an agreement on bills in order to fund the government for the upcoming fiscal year. (The Balance) In the Trump era, a huge factor in the ‘budget battle’ surrounded the need for increased funding for the wall on the southern border.
The Mexico-American wall was one of the main platforms on which president Trump campaigned for his presidency in 2016. 
While trying to fulfill his promises to his supporters and constituency and acquire the funding, he was faced with opposition from Democratic legislatures. This is feud led to the 2018-2019 historic government shutdown. For the duration of the shutdown, approximately 800,000 federal employees were not given pay and the economic activity was reduced by $3 billion. (Bipartisan Policy Center) After coming to an agreement in February, which reinstates the national debt limit to $22 trillion, President Trump and Congress came to an agreement for the upcoming fiscal year, however “By this point, nearly half of the fiscal year ha[d] already elapsed.” (Bipartisan Policy Center) Through all of this, we see the legislative discord between parties that led up to thousands of people unpaid and the loss of millions in economic circulation. 
Like Professor Hitt stated, are some politicians in office to simply disagree with their opposition or are they working to represent what they’re constituents want?
This is also an issue within the North Carolina district of Cumberland County. In a North Carolina Public Radio interview with Representative Billy Richardson it explains how the “House Democrats want to hold the line in sustaining Gov. Roy Cooper’s budget veto…” (WUNC) The Republicans of the house are trying to convince a small number of Democrats to help pass an override. Journalist Rusty Jacobs asks if Rep. Billy Richardson is for the override. His reply, “No… I have two jobs as a representative. One is to represent the people and the interests of my district… because I live in a district in sore need of many things.” (WUNC) Though a Democrat, Richardson aligns himself with the wants of his opposing party members that being a higher standard for teachers pay and local provisions for disasters. Richardson’s fellow Democrats are aimed towards Medicaid expansion and object cooperate tax cuts (WUNC).  The article explaining the interview goes on later to explain that although he believes in what many of the Republicans are aiming towards, he still may not cross party lines. Richardson states he “is a North Carolinian and an American with a ‘sacred’ responsibility to act in the best interest of his constituents and the people of the state. (WUNC)
Both of these examples show the complexity of budgeting while representing a constituency and what gridlocks can come of it. The economic downfall, while the government is stationary, can be catastrophic on a national level and within small districts. Some politicians may play into the opposition that our bipartisan government is founded upon and some such as Representative Richardson may be trying to act as trustees for those they represent while keeping their political affiliation. 



Citation

Amadeo, Kimberly. “Why the Government Shut Down and What Happens Next.” The Balance. https://www.thebalance.com/government-shutdown-3305683 (September 19, 2019).

“Budget Battles Defining Washington: A Timeline | Bipartisan Policy Center.” https://bipartisanpolicy.org/budget-timeline/ (September 17, 2019).

Jacobs, Rusty. “Democratic Rep. Laments Lack Of Leadership Amid NC Budget Battle.” https://www.wunc.org/post/democratic-rep-laments-lack-leadership-amid-nc-budget-battle (September 17, 2019).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Proposition DD: Let the Bets Flow

On November 5 th , 2019, one of the two measures placed on the ballot in Colorado was Proposition DD, giving the electorate a referendum on the legality of sports betting within the state; it also would impose a tax upon the net revenue of those establishments accepting such bets, the majority of which would provide funding for the Colorado Water Plan and the remainder of which would be used to regulate sports betting and provide services for gambling addiction. Since 1992, gambling on the outcome of most sporting events had been outlawed nationally under the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, or PASPA, though with the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association , this Act was deemed unconstitutional, and state legislatures became free to legislate regarding sports betting and its legality. Proposition DD was put to a public ballot under the provisions of the TABOR amendment to the Colorado Constitution, a ‘Taxpayer Bill of Rights’ ...
2 comments
Read more

The Proponents of Proposition DD

Proposition DD and its proponents One of the most significant and noteworthy results of the recent elections in Colorado was the passing of Proposition DD. A legislative proposition is a proposal placed on the ballot by the state legislature itself. The legislature in Denver referred the measure with House Bill 1327 during the spring season, with easy bipartisan support. [1] The proposition however did not receive such widespread support from the public, only narrowly passing, and being too close to call on election night. This is illustrated below. [2] The passage of Proposition DD legalised gambling on sports events, beginning in six months’ time; making Colorado the nineteenth state to legalise sports betting. Colorado’s seventeen casino operators will be eligible to apply for licenses for both physical and online sportsbooks, with the Colorado Division of Gaming being tasked to regulate the market. [3] ‘Yes on Proposition DD’ raised about $2.83 million for ca...
Post a Comment
Read more

Immigration Visas and Polarization

Megan King  The story I decided to investigate in National News is , “ Federal Judges Block Trump Policy Targeting Legal Immigrants on Public Benefits ” by Claire Hansen demonstrates how difficult the policymaking procedure can be. In regard to the separations of powers, this ideology does give each branch equal representation, which in this case was to block a new policy. In this situation, three judges filed lawsuits because the new policy the Government was going to implement that visas could be denied if they think that immigrants who are going to use public benefits. It is known as the “public charge” policy which is basically, “any individual who is deemed likely to accept a benefit is considered a public charger” which was just another attempt from the Trump Administration desiring to stop immigration (Hansen). There has already been policies in place that set up circumstances that Immigration Courts and the Government have set up to deny immigration residence just in...
2 comments
Read more