Skip to main content

The Contemporary Issue: Budget Battling


Government spending has always led to issues between parties in the legislative branch but since the Obama Administration, the problem has seemed to escalate, possibly due to our party’s and country’s polarization. The Budget Control Act of 2011 under the Obama administration, “Increase[d] the debt limit in stages through 2012” and “Establishe[d] caps on discretionary spending through 2021.” (Bipartisan Policy Center) This implemented routine spending cuts through to the year 2021. Jump forward to the Trump presidency in late December 2018. This was the beginning of a 34-day government shutdown, something of a record-breaker. 
As described by The Balance, the government shuts down when Congress cannot come to an agreement on bills in order to fund the government for the upcoming fiscal year. (The Balance) In the Trump era, a huge factor in the ‘budget battle’ surrounded the need for increased funding for the wall on the southern border.
The Mexico-American wall was one of the main platforms on which president Trump campaigned for his presidency in 2016. 
While trying to fulfill his promises to his supporters and constituency and acquire the funding, he was faced with opposition from Democratic legislatures. This is feud led to the 2018-2019 historic government shutdown. For the duration of the shutdown, approximately 800,000 federal employees were not given pay and the economic activity was reduced by $3 billion. (Bipartisan Policy Center) After coming to an agreement in February, which reinstates the national debt limit to $22 trillion, President Trump and Congress came to an agreement for the upcoming fiscal year, however “By this point, nearly half of the fiscal year ha[d] already elapsed.” (Bipartisan Policy Center) Through all of this, we see the legislative discord between parties that led up to thousands of people unpaid and the loss of millions in economic circulation. 
Like Professor Hitt stated, are some politicians in office to simply disagree with their opposition or are they working to represent what they’re constituents want?
This is also an issue within the North Carolina district of Cumberland County. In a North Carolina Public Radio interview with Representative Billy Richardson it explains how the “House Democrats want to hold the line in sustaining Gov. Roy Cooper’s budget veto…” (WUNC) The Republicans of the house are trying to convince a small number of Democrats to help pass an override. Journalist Rusty Jacobs asks if Rep. Billy Richardson is for the override. His reply, “No… I have two jobs as a representative. One is to represent the people and the interests of my district… because I live in a district in sore need of many things.” (WUNC) Though a Democrat, Richardson aligns himself with the wants of his opposing party members that being a higher standard for teachers pay and local provisions for disasters. Richardson’s fellow Democrats are aimed towards Medicaid expansion and object cooperate tax cuts (WUNC).  The article explaining the interview goes on later to explain that although he believes in what many of the Republicans are aiming towards, he still may not cross party lines. Richardson states he “is a North Carolinian and an American with a ‘sacred’ responsibility to act in the best interest of his constituents and the people of the state. (WUNC)
Both of these examples show the complexity of budgeting while representing a constituency and what gridlocks can come of it. The economic downfall, while the government is stationary, can be catastrophic on a national level and within small districts. Some politicians may play into the opposition that our bipartisan government is founded upon and some such as Representative Richardson may be trying to act as trustees for those they represent while keeping their political affiliation. 



Citation

Amadeo, Kimberly. “Why the Government Shut Down and What Happens Next.” The Balance. https://www.thebalance.com/government-shutdown-3305683 (September 19, 2019).

“Budget Battles Defining Washington: A Timeline | Bipartisan Policy Center.” https://bipartisanpolicy.org/budget-timeline/ (September 17, 2019).

Jacobs, Rusty. “Democratic Rep. Laments Lack Of Leadership Amid NC Budget Battle.” https://www.wunc.org/post/democratic-rep-laments-lack-leadership-amid-nc-budget-battle (September 17, 2019).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gun Control in Colorado

Due to the prevalence of mass shootings in the United States, many states have adapted gun legislation to target the issue. Colorado is no exception. The House Bill 1177 or more commonly known as “the red flag bill” was passed this previous legislative session (Aguilar). The bill allows the court to seize firearms from individuals who are deemed a threat to themselves or to others (Aguilar). This considerable gun legislation is significant for Democrats who have advocated for gun control for years. More importantly, the passing of this bill may once again demonstrate which party has been gaining momentum in Colorado these past few years. Colorado’s legislature has generally sided to the left in recent times (Strayer 141). This is a significant shift from the more Republican leaning legislature that Colorado was previously used to (Strayer 141). Furthermore, Colorado’s House Bill 1177 is in no way addressing the issue in a very unique way. Figure 1 below demonstrates nationwide...
6 comments
Read more

Insulin cap in Colorado

In the United States, the topic of medication prices has increased substantially, specifically insulin. Insulin is a medication used to treat type one Diabetes which typically costs a thousand dollars or more depending on how much you need, and how much your insurance is willing to pay. Colorado changed this with a bill designed to put a cap on the copay for insulin. The bill HB19-1216 was signed into law by Governor Jared Polis in May of 2019. This bill states that “a carrier that provides coverage for prescription insulin drugs pursuant to the terms of a health coverage plan the carrier offers shall cap the total amount that a covered person is required to pay for a covered prescription insulin drug at an amount not to exceed one hundred dollars per thirty-day supply of insulin, regardless of the amount of type of insulin needed to fill the covered person’s prescription.” This bill will go into effect on January 1st, 2020 and will be overseen by the department of law who will investi...
7 comments
Read more

TABOR and Colorado Politics Post-CC

       One of the more contentious topics within Colorado politics is budgeting and funding for projects, education, and revenue intake. This came to a head in this year's election with Proposition CC. Despite failing at the ballot box, the Democratic Party is pushing ahead with the 2020 legislative agenda that includes drafts to eliminate the Tax Payer's Bill of Rights or amend it to ensure more accessible revenue for the party's policy objectives. What is critical to the debate is the increasing partisan divide within Colorado, the historical shift from Republican control to Democrat trifectas in state government, and the institutional mechanisms that have hampered strategy for the dominant party. Also, in the mix are interest groups that influence local politics which can help uncover party strategy from another perspective.        The Colorado Fiscal Institute (CFI) a left-leaning think tank, is a key player in this battle, authoring s everal...
6 comments
Read more