Skip to main content

Nick Beach: Equal Pay for Equal Work


Nick Beach
POLS-304
18 September 2019
Equal Pay for Equal Work
            In today’s working world it may not matter how hard you work, how equal your work is to your co-workers or hell even if you are doing better work than your co-worker, you may still be paid less.  Does this sound wrong to many of you? Well it should, and as a matter of fact it is. Today, this is a sad truth and reality for many women living in America.  This naturally arises the question of, what is our government doing about this?
            In 2014, the U.S. Senate blocked the Paycheck Fairness Act.  This act would have made it illegal for employers to pay unequal wage gaps to men and women who are performing the same work.  Now before all of that, the equal pay act was passed as an amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963.  This prohibited discrimination on account of sex in the payment of wages by employers.  The problem with this law is the very high burden one (a woman) must meet to prove that there discrimination going on.  In order to win this case she or he I suppose would have to establish a prima facie case of gender based wage discrimination under the EPA.  They would have to show different wages are paid to employees of the opposite sex who work in jobs that require substantially equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and are performed under similar working conditions in the same establishment.  A major catch to this is in the same establishment, even if it is with the same company in the same state just simply different buildings it would not qualify as such.  Furthermore in order for the employee to win he would just have to prove one of the statutes that allow unequal pay for equal work. 
            Today, the Paycheck Fairness Act amendment would; prohibit employers from using salary history (this ensures salaries are not based on prior pay disparities), protect against retaliation for discussing pay with colleagues, ensure equal pay for equal work, equalize discrimination claims based on gender, race, and ethnicity, Support employers and employees to achieve fair pay practices.
Below shows a graph of Women’s median usual weekly earning as a percent of men’s earning in the 2nd quarter of 2019 averages.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics 

            With there being a clear problem that needs addressing this leads us with the question of what can we do about the gender pay gap? 
Well according to Siri Chilazi, a research fellow at the women and policy program at Harvard John F. Kennedy School of Government, “Pay fairness is a moral issue, but it is also an economic issue.” She continues to further say the current gap is commonly described as 20 percent.  One possible solution to this issue would be for employers to be required to share their gender gap data with the federal government in order to hold companies accountable.  Another solution could be for employers to use audits for the gaps after publicly disclosing them. 
            This brings together the point that this issue is going to be a difficult one to solve however, one we all need to work together one.  Professor Hitt brought up an interesting point in class on September 18th, that being paternity leave.  Not only does this press the question of equality but it brings up a very interesting point on the separation of men and women.  With that I will leave you all with the question of whether or not in today’s society women are fully being treated as equals?





Comments

  1. Hi Nick! Good job on your blog post! You have brought up some really interesting points. As a women, I think this issue is important to myself and the other 50 or so percent of US women! I think the current process seems extremely rigorous to prove this gender pay gap, which to some may or may not be a good thing. But either way it's important for lawmakers to represent their constituents and if they want the Paycheck Fairness Act to be passed then lawmakers should respect that.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nick, I found your in depth description of the Paycheck Fairness Act very interesting. In terms of addressing gender pay gap, I personally think having companies report their gender pay gap to the federal government would be very controversial. It has the right intention, but I would not be surprised to see such action abused. It could be very easy for companies to mislead reports and ,therefore, create a new set of issues.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nick, very interesting topic and very well written. You can tell in the tone of the paper that this is something you have a personal connection too and actually care about. I myself am not as educated in the field of equal pay as I would like to be or should be, so reading this blog was very intriguing. I really liked how you focused more on the legislative piece than the actual data behind the gap. Of course seeing the data behind this topic would be moving, but I feel as if people are less educated on the actual legislation that is allowing for the pay gap to occur, and with that, what legislation could be passed to help diminish the gap that was not passed. Thank you for educating me a little bit further regarding this topic!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Proposition DD: Let the Bets Flow

On November 5 th , 2019, one of the two measures placed on the ballot in Colorado was Proposition DD, giving the electorate a referendum on the legality of sports betting within the state; it also would impose a tax upon the net revenue of those establishments accepting such bets, the majority of which would provide funding for the Colorado Water Plan and the remainder of which would be used to regulate sports betting and provide services for gambling addiction. Since 1992, gambling on the outcome of most sporting events had been outlawed nationally under the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, or PASPA, though with the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association , this Act was deemed unconstitutional, and state legislatures became free to legislate regarding sports betting and its legality. Proposition DD was put to a public ballot under the provisions of the TABOR amendment to the Colorado Constitution, a ‘Taxpayer Bill of Rights’ ...

The Proponents of Proposition DD

Proposition DD and its proponents One of the most significant and noteworthy results of the recent elections in Colorado was the passing of Proposition DD. A legislative proposition is a proposal placed on the ballot by the state legislature itself. The legislature in Denver referred the measure with House Bill 1327 during the spring season, with easy bipartisan support. [1] The proposition however did not receive such widespread support from the public, only narrowly passing, and being too close to call on election night. This is illustrated below. [2] The passage of Proposition DD legalised gambling on sports events, beginning in six months’ time; making Colorado the nineteenth state to legalise sports betting. Colorado’s seventeen casino operators will be eligible to apply for licenses for both physical and online sportsbooks, with the Colorado Division of Gaming being tasked to regulate the market. [3] ‘Yes on Proposition DD’ raised about $2.83 million for ca...

Immigration Visas and Polarization

Megan King  The story I decided to investigate in National News is , “ Federal Judges Block Trump Policy Targeting Legal Immigrants on Public Benefits ” by Claire Hansen demonstrates how difficult the policymaking procedure can be. In regard to the separations of powers, this ideology does give each branch equal representation, which in this case was to block a new policy. In this situation, three judges filed lawsuits because the new policy the Government was going to implement that visas could be denied if they think that immigrants who are going to use public benefits. It is known as the “public charge” policy which is basically, “any individual who is deemed likely to accept a benefit is considered a public charger” which was just another attempt from the Trump Administration desiring to stop immigration (Hansen). There has already been policies in place that set up circumstances that Immigration Courts and the Government have set up to deny immigration residence just in...