Skip to main content

Nick Beach: Equal Pay for Equal Work


Nick Beach
POLS-304
18 September 2019
Equal Pay for Equal Work
            In today’s working world it may not matter how hard you work, how equal your work is to your co-workers or hell even if you are doing better work than your co-worker, you may still be paid less.  Does this sound wrong to many of you? Well it should, and as a matter of fact it is. Today, this is a sad truth and reality for many women living in America.  This naturally arises the question of, what is our government doing about this?
            In 2014, the U.S. Senate blocked the Paycheck Fairness Act.  This act would have made it illegal for employers to pay unequal wage gaps to men and women who are performing the same work.  Now before all of that, the equal pay act was passed as an amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963.  This prohibited discrimination on account of sex in the payment of wages by employers.  The problem with this law is the very high burden one (a woman) must meet to prove that there discrimination going on.  In order to win this case she or he I suppose would have to establish a prima facie case of gender based wage discrimination under the EPA.  They would have to show different wages are paid to employees of the opposite sex who work in jobs that require substantially equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and are performed under similar working conditions in the same establishment.  A major catch to this is in the same establishment, even if it is with the same company in the same state just simply different buildings it would not qualify as such.  Furthermore in order for the employee to win he would just have to prove one of the statutes that allow unequal pay for equal work. 
            Today, the Paycheck Fairness Act amendment would; prohibit employers from using salary history (this ensures salaries are not based on prior pay disparities), protect against retaliation for discussing pay with colleagues, ensure equal pay for equal work, equalize discrimination claims based on gender, race, and ethnicity, Support employers and employees to achieve fair pay practices.
Below shows a graph of Women’s median usual weekly earning as a percent of men’s earning in the 2nd quarter of 2019 averages.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics 

            With there being a clear problem that needs addressing this leads us with the question of what can we do about the gender pay gap? 
Well according to Siri Chilazi, a research fellow at the women and policy program at Harvard John F. Kennedy School of Government, “Pay fairness is a moral issue, but it is also an economic issue.” She continues to further say the current gap is commonly described as 20 percent.  One possible solution to this issue would be for employers to be required to share their gender gap data with the federal government in order to hold companies accountable.  Another solution could be for employers to use audits for the gaps after publicly disclosing them. 
            This brings together the point that this issue is going to be a difficult one to solve however, one we all need to work together one.  Professor Hitt brought up an interesting point in class on September 18th, that being paternity leave.  Not only does this press the question of equality but it brings up a very interesting point on the separation of men and women.  With that I will leave you all with the question of whether or not in today’s society women are fully being treated as equals?





Comments

  1. Hi Nick! Good job on your blog post! You have brought up some really interesting points. As a women, I think this issue is important to myself and the other 50 or so percent of US women! I think the current process seems extremely rigorous to prove this gender pay gap, which to some may or may not be a good thing. But either way it's important for lawmakers to represent their constituents and if they want the Paycheck Fairness Act to be passed then lawmakers should respect that.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nick, I found your in depth description of the Paycheck Fairness Act very interesting. In terms of addressing gender pay gap, I personally think having companies report their gender pay gap to the federal government would be very controversial. It has the right intention, but I would not be surprised to see such action abused. It could be very easy for companies to mislead reports and ,therefore, create a new set of issues.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nick, very interesting topic and very well written. You can tell in the tone of the paper that this is something you have a personal connection too and actually care about. I myself am not as educated in the field of equal pay as I would like to be or should be, so reading this blog was very intriguing. I really liked how you focused more on the legislative piece than the actual data behind the gap. Of course seeing the data behind this topic would be moving, but I feel as if people are less educated on the actual legislation that is allowing for the pay gap to occur, and with that, what legislation could be passed to help diminish the gap that was not passed. Thank you for educating me a little bit further regarding this topic!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Two-Party System: Possible Impacts on Polarization & Congressional Policy Making

Edward Baisley Prof. Matthew Hitt POLS 304 16 Oct. 2019 Blog Post 2 (Two Party System)             The two-party system in the United States of America has been an integral part of our political culture since the country’s inception in the 1700’s. Since then, our country has accepted this system as an inevitable part of how our nation’s leaders are chosen, nominated, and elected into office. Now days, when it comes to our contemporary national congress, both parties have spent an incredible amount of money and resources in an attempt to seize majority control in both the House and the Senate. This attempt to seize majority power in our legislative branch has led to a situation of heated competition. In fact, in recent history, we as citizens of this nation have seen our national Legislator become a partisan battle ground in which both parties and their members are seemingly polarized to an extent that the ...

TABOR and Colorado Politics Post-CC

       One of the more contentious topics within Colorado politics is budgeting and funding for projects, education, and revenue intake. This came to a head in this year's election with Proposition CC. Despite failing at the ballot box, the Democratic Party is pushing ahead with the 2020 legislative agenda that includes drafts to eliminate the Tax Payer's Bill of Rights or amend it to ensure more accessible revenue for the party's policy objectives. What is critical to the debate is the increasing partisan divide within Colorado, the historical shift from Republican control to Democrat trifectas in state government, and the institutional mechanisms that have hampered strategy for the dominant party. Also, in the mix are interest groups that influence local politics which can help uncover party strategy from another perspective.        The Colorado Fiscal Institute (CFI) a left-leaning think tank, is a key player in this battle, authoring s everal...

TABOR & Proposition CC: Providing Context to Colorado's Tax Problem

Edward Baisley Prof. Matthew Hitt POLS 304 Dec. 2019 Blog Post 3 (TABOR and Proposition CC) Colorado's tax system is very unique in comparison to pretty much every other state in the U.S. Arguably the biggest aspect of the tax system that is unique is the amendment to the Colorado Constitution known as TABOR or the Tax Payers Bill of Rights. This amendment which was drafted into law in 1992, has many implications for Colorado's state and local governments. One of the main implications is that TABOR requires the state and local governments of Colorado to acquire voter approval before any tax increase can be implemented. Some other more less known implications are detailed by Denver Post author Anna Staver, she explains that TABOR: “ Limits how many tax dollars governments can keep … It’s called the TABOR cap, anything a government collects above the cap gets returned as a TABOR tax refund … (TABOR) Limits when lawmakers can ask voters to raise taxe...