Skip to main content

Legislation's Death


Mary Leonard
Blog Post 1
In the New Yorker article, “Our Broken Constitution”, the author, Jeffrey Toobin, discusses professor Sanford Levinson’s opinion that Senate wields too much power and is a major fault of the Constitutions (Toobin). He claims that this power gives it the ability to constantly stifle the actions of the other branches of government. In the article, Levinson specifies instances where President Obama tried to pass different legislation through Congress in his second term but repeatedly got shot down, including attempts to reform gun control and immigration (Toobin). To him, the non-proportional Senate should not have the ability to do this (Toobin). Nonetheless, their right to deny legislation, especially that of which is proposed to them by the president, is granted under Article 1 of the constitution in the form of checks and balances. Through this doctrine, much of what the executive branch wants to do must be approved with the Senate’s consent. As free as the president may seem when it comes to making decisions and sending out executive orders, the purse used to fund these choices is controlled by Congress.
Levinson is not wrong with his claim that the vast majority of legislation should not expect to make it out of Congress alive and well. As shown in the table, https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/statistics created by Govtrack, no more than 11% of total legislation have become passed resolutions, with the majority of years average closer to about 5% (Govtrack). No one presidency and chamber, whether they be democratic or republican, holds a significant amount of sway over the other when it comes to the amount of legislation that gets passed (Govtrack). The numbers are consistent through the years, so is there truly a point to try to change it as Levinson has proposed.  It makes it even harder for Congress to agree on what to pass when it is split down the middle with the two parties on either side. President Trump has this issue right now making it difficult for him to pass some legislation. But the checks and balances go both ways, and the President can also prevent Congress from getting legislation passed through his tool of the veto.
Recently, in Kansas, there is a move to give Congress the upper hand over the President when it comes to making decisions about tariffs (Wise). Farmers there are unhappy that the tariffs have lasted so long and have resulted in a continuous negative impact on them (Wise). Kansas’s senator, Jerry Moran, and others have heard these complaints of their constituents and, as a proper delegate would do, have decided to take action (Wise). Many of those that are pushing for this reform are Republican, and have specified that it is not on attack on Trump, but just an attempt to rebalance the powers (Wise). The legislation proposed would make it so the president has to have Congressional approval before enacting tariffs (Wise). Along with this, instead of the Department of Commerce, the Defense Department would be the one that would have to ratify any tariffs that were placed (Wise).
This has the opposite issue that Obama had. The Journal claims that this legislation won’t get very far because “Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has refused to bring bills to the floor without some certainty that Mr. Trump would sign them” (Wise). This, in an essence, contradicts Levinson’s notions that all legislation dies because of Senate. It is very dependent on who’s in control of the Senate and the House, who the President is at the time, and what the legislation entails.
This bill, although supported by some representatives from both parties, will struggle to make it all the way through the process. Due to the fact that this bill gives Congress more power, it might just make its way through that part of the process, yet, once it reaches the president, it is sure to be vetoed and sent right back to where it came from. Because the bill must be voted on in the Democratic controlled House, then the Republican controlled Senate, and then lastly signed by the President, the probability of its demise is extremely high. This process does indeed make it difficult for bills to get through, however, those that do would have the support from the two different parties, which is important and more representative of the people’s desires.














Bibliography
Govtrack. January 3, 2019. “Statistics and Historical Comparison.” Date Accessed, September
18, 2019. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/statistics

Toobin, Jeffrey. December 1, 2013. The New Yorker. “Our Broken Constitution.” Date
Accessed, September 18, 2019. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/12/09/our-broken-constitution

Wise, Lindsay. September 15, 2019. The Wall Street Journal. “Lawmakers Make Long-Shot Bid
to Check Presidential Tariff Powers.” Date Accessed, September 18, 2019. https://www.wsj.com/articles/lawmakers-make-long-shot-bid-to-check-presidential-tariff-powers-11568571897?mod=searchresults&page=1&pos=8

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gun Control in Colorado

Due to the prevalence of mass shootings in the United States, many states have adapted gun legislation to target the issue. Colorado is no exception. The House Bill 1177 or more commonly known as “the red flag bill” was passed this previous legislative session (Aguilar). The bill allows the court to seize firearms from individuals who are deemed a threat to themselves or to others (Aguilar). This considerable gun legislation is significant for Democrats who have advocated for gun control for years. More importantly, the passing of this bill may once again demonstrate which party has been gaining momentum in Colorado these past few years. Colorado’s legislature has generally sided to the left in recent times (Strayer 141). This is a significant shift from the more Republican leaning legislature that Colorado was previously used to (Strayer 141). Furthermore, Colorado’s House Bill 1177 is in no way addressing the issue in a very unique way. Figure 1 below demonstrates nationwide...
6 comments
Read more

Insulin cap in Colorado

In the United States, the topic of medication prices has increased substantially, specifically insulin. Insulin is a medication used to treat type one Diabetes which typically costs a thousand dollars or more depending on how much you need, and how much your insurance is willing to pay. Colorado changed this with a bill designed to put a cap on the copay for insulin. The bill HB19-1216 was signed into law by Governor Jared Polis in May of 2019. This bill states that “a carrier that provides coverage for prescription insulin drugs pursuant to the terms of a health coverage plan the carrier offers shall cap the total amount that a covered person is required to pay for a covered prescription insulin drug at an amount not to exceed one hundred dollars per thirty-day supply of insulin, regardless of the amount of type of insulin needed to fill the covered person’s prescription.” This bill will go into effect on January 1st, 2020 and will be overseen by the department of law who will investi...
7 comments
Read more

TABOR and Colorado Politics Post-CC

       One of the more contentious topics within Colorado politics is budgeting and funding for projects, education, and revenue intake. This came to a head in this year's election with Proposition CC. Despite failing at the ballot box, the Democratic Party is pushing ahead with the 2020 legislative agenda that includes drafts to eliminate the Tax Payer's Bill of Rights or amend it to ensure more accessible revenue for the party's policy objectives. What is critical to the debate is the increasing partisan divide within Colorado, the historical shift from Republican control to Democrat trifectas in state government, and the institutional mechanisms that have hampered strategy for the dominant party. Also, in the mix are interest groups that influence local politics which can help uncover party strategy from another perspective.        The Colorado Fiscal Institute (CFI) a left-leaning think tank, is a key player in this battle, authoring s everal...
6 comments
Read more