Skip to main content

Legislation's Death


Mary Leonard
Blog Post 1
In the New Yorker article, “Our Broken Constitution”, the author, Jeffrey Toobin, discusses professor Sanford Levinson’s opinion that Senate wields too much power and is a major fault of the Constitutions (Toobin). He claims that this power gives it the ability to constantly stifle the actions of the other branches of government. In the article, Levinson specifies instances where President Obama tried to pass different legislation through Congress in his second term but repeatedly got shot down, including attempts to reform gun control and immigration (Toobin). To him, the non-proportional Senate should not have the ability to do this (Toobin). Nonetheless, their right to deny legislation, especially that of which is proposed to them by the president, is granted under Article 1 of the constitution in the form of checks and balances. Through this doctrine, much of what the executive branch wants to do must be approved with the Senate’s consent. As free as the president may seem when it comes to making decisions and sending out executive orders, the purse used to fund these choices is controlled by Congress.
Levinson is not wrong with his claim that the vast majority of legislation should not expect to make it out of Congress alive and well. As shown in the table, https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/statistics created by Govtrack, no more than 11% of total legislation have become passed resolutions, with the majority of years average closer to about 5% (Govtrack). No one presidency and chamber, whether they be democratic or republican, holds a significant amount of sway over the other when it comes to the amount of legislation that gets passed (Govtrack). The numbers are consistent through the years, so is there truly a point to try to change it as Levinson has proposed.  It makes it even harder for Congress to agree on what to pass when it is split down the middle with the two parties on either side. President Trump has this issue right now making it difficult for him to pass some legislation. But the checks and balances go both ways, and the President can also prevent Congress from getting legislation passed through his tool of the veto.
Recently, in Kansas, there is a move to give Congress the upper hand over the President when it comes to making decisions about tariffs (Wise). Farmers there are unhappy that the tariffs have lasted so long and have resulted in a continuous negative impact on them (Wise). Kansas’s senator, Jerry Moran, and others have heard these complaints of their constituents and, as a proper delegate would do, have decided to take action (Wise). Many of those that are pushing for this reform are Republican, and have specified that it is not on attack on Trump, but just an attempt to rebalance the powers (Wise). The legislation proposed would make it so the president has to have Congressional approval before enacting tariffs (Wise). Along with this, instead of the Department of Commerce, the Defense Department would be the one that would have to ratify any tariffs that were placed (Wise).
This has the opposite issue that Obama had. The Journal claims that this legislation won’t get very far because “Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has refused to bring bills to the floor without some certainty that Mr. Trump would sign them” (Wise). This, in an essence, contradicts Levinson’s notions that all legislation dies because of Senate. It is very dependent on who’s in control of the Senate and the House, who the President is at the time, and what the legislation entails.
This bill, although supported by some representatives from both parties, will struggle to make it all the way through the process. Due to the fact that this bill gives Congress more power, it might just make its way through that part of the process, yet, once it reaches the president, it is sure to be vetoed and sent right back to where it came from. Because the bill must be voted on in the Democratic controlled House, then the Republican controlled Senate, and then lastly signed by the President, the probability of its demise is extremely high. This process does indeed make it difficult for bills to get through, however, those that do would have the support from the two different parties, which is important and more representative of the people’s desires.














Bibliography
Govtrack. January 3, 2019. “Statistics and Historical Comparison.” Date Accessed, September
18, 2019. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/statistics

Toobin, Jeffrey. December 1, 2013. The New Yorker. “Our Broken Constitution.” Date
Accessed, September 18, 2019. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/12/09/our-broken-constitution

Wise, Lindsay. September 15, 2019. The Wall Street Journal. “Lawmakers Make Long-Shot Bid
to Check Presidential Tariff Powers.” Date Accessed, September 18, 2019. https://www.wsj.com/articles/lawmakers-make-long-shot-bid-to-check-presidential-tariff-powers-11568571897?mod=searchresults&page=1&pos=8

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Ballot Initiative in Colorado

    One of the most distinctive features of the legislative process in Colorado is the prevalence of the ballot initiative. In the election this November, voters had the opportunity to approve their own laws. One of these laws included a proposition that would legalize sports betting.     This is not the first time that voters have had the ability to make hugely influential decisions. Voters have voted to legalize marijuana. In Colorado, they even approve tax increases because of the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, or TABOR. This means that, unlike in other states, Colorado voters have legislative power of their own.      One of these most recent initiatives involved sports betting. Colorado would legalize sports betting, but sports betting would be taxed. This revenue would be used to fund plans to address Colorado's water problem. However, according to the Colorado Sun, the money from sports betting will not generate any money to address these water iss...
Post a Comment
Read more

TABOR & Proposition CC: Providing Context to Colorado's Tax Problem

Edward Baisley Prof. Matthew Hitt POLS 304 Dec. 2019 Blog Post 3 (TABOR and Proposition CC) Colorado's tax system is very unique in comparison to pretty much every other state in the U.S. Arguably the biggest aspect of the tax system that is unique is the amendment to the Colorado Constitution known as TABOR or the Tax Payers Bill of Rights. This amendment which was drafted into law in 1992, has many implications for Colorado's state and local governments. One of the main implications is that TABOR requires the state and local governments of Colorado to acquire voter approval before any tax increase can be implemented. Some other more less known implications are detailed by Denver Post author Anna Staver, she explains that TABOR: “ Limits how many tax dollars governments can keep … It’s called the TABOR cap, anything a government collects above the cap gets returned as a TABOR tax refund … (TABOR) Limits when lawmakers can ask voters to raise taxe...
1 comment
Read more

The Flawed American Electoral System

A free and fair election is one that is inclusive to all of the population. A democratic state requires active citizen participation to ensure equal representation. The framers of the constitution originally wanted the United States government to only be governed by educated white men. It was not until 1920 that the 19th amendment was passed that allowed white females to vote in America. Then it was not until the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that allowed African-Americans the right to vote freely. There were many amendments and reforms throughout history that has changed our election system. Different changes to state election process will ensure an equitable election system. This is a highly debated legislative issue that goes back and forth for the past decade and into the 2020 election. It is crucial for such a powerful and free country to protect its proud democratic values.  There are still issues with the American election systems. There are a lot of holes in represe...
1 comment
Read more