Skip to main content

Jonathan Kniss: Broken Legislature


Jonathan Kniss

Blog Post 1 Broken Legislature.

In a seemingly extremely polarized time period in our nations political history, one opinion seems to be held unanimously by Americans, and that is that congress is doing a bad job.


Macintosh HD:private:var:folders:6w:csq7mn597fn3qpwvnknbpkc00000gn:T:TemporaryItems:ucpqere8jkw3c-oj5rz5ua.png



This recently completed Gallup poll conducted this year shows the consistent disapproval of congressional representatives. After hitting its peak of 84% in 2002, the congress has experience a steep and steady decline in support of their work. even dropping to a low of 9% during President Obama’s second term in 2014.  But what exactly is contributing to this negative view of our legislature, especially in the last few years?

A major part of this issue is addressed in the article “Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion among Political Elites’ by Brookman and Skovron. The constitution states that the job of the congress is to represent the individual constituents that they represent. However, the system suffers a major hit when the legislature fails to enact policies and conduct business in a way that is not conducive to the will of their constituents. In there article Brookman and Skovron provide many statistics and proving this to be the unfortunate predicament we are finding ourselves in. The major issue they address is the legislatures inability to accurately gage the standing of their constituents. One study they used stated that “American politicians from both parties in 2012 and 2014 believed that support for conservative positions on these issues in their constituencies was much higher than it actually was” (Brookman and Skovron). It is easy to see how a politician’s incorrect view of their constituents can lead to misinformed policy initiatives. The same study goes on to find that on the issue of gun control “Politicians’ right-skewed misperceptions exceed 20 percentage points” (Brookman and Skovron).

Macintosh HD:Users:jonathankniss:Desktop:thumbnail.jpg

This table from their article shows the extent of such misperceptions of widely held American viewpoints.  All 5 of the first issues listed are considered to be liberal in their considerations.  In every case the elite perception assumed more of a conservative bias that was actually the case (Brookman and Skovron). And with respect to the prospect of more in-depth background checks for potential gun owners the estimate given by political elites was more than 35 points wrong in their estimates, unrealistically favoring the conservative viewpoint.

Jeffery Toobin in his article “Our Broken Constitution” addresses another flaw that many are worried about in our current system and that is a fundamental fracturing in the application of our constitution to a functioning legislature in 2019.  Although it is often stated with a sense of pride, the fact that the United States is utilizing the world’s oldest constitution is a statement that would have driven fear into the hearts of our founding father, including Thomas Jefferson  (Toobin). In the article  Sanford Levinson, a professor of law at the University of Texas at Austin, believes that the constitution “no longer works”. Taking this notion back to the foundation of the document he states that the constitution has “almost insurmountable barriers in the way of any acceptable notion of democracy.” (Toobin).  With political polarization and misrepresentation on the rise Levinson’s assumptions of the constitutions dysfunction in the legislature may be unfolding before our eyes.






References


BROOCKMAN, DAVID E., and CHRISTOPHER SKOVRON. “Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion among Political Elites.” American Political Science Review, vol. 112, no. 3, 2018, pp. 542–563., doi:10.1017/S0003055418000011.

Gallup, Inc. “Congress and the Public.”Gallup.com, Gallup, 12 Sept. 2019, https://news.gallup.com/poll/1600/congress-public.aspx.

Toobin, Jeffery. “Our Broken Constitution”. The New Yorker. New York, NY. December 1, 2013. Accessed on September 16, 2019 https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/12/09/our-broken-constitution





Comments

  1. Good job! With the trend of the opinion of representatives being consistently negative, it will be interesting to see if it continues to decrease over time. Representatives not being able to gauge what their constituents want makes one wonder if it is being done by accident, or if they are just more worried with the seat they have over the job itself. This seems to be a systematic issue, but also could be the fault of constituents that keep reelecting the same people they are disappointed in. It seems to be a vicious cycle that will never stop going round and round.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You did a great job on your blog post. In fact, your post helped me raise a few questions. For example, I wonder if the poor view the American Public has on Congress, has any correlation with the lack of interest in midterm elections. It is no secret that most Americans only care about the Presidential elections, and I wonder if that has anything to do with most Americans disliking Congress.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Two-Party System: Possible Impacts on Polarization & Congressional Policy Making

Edward Baisley Prof. Matthew Hitt POLS 304 16 Oct. 2019 Blog Post 2 (Two Party System)             The two-party system in the United States of America has been an integral part of our political culture since the country’s inception in the 1700’s. Since then, our country has accepted this system as an inevitable part of how our nation’s leaders are chosen, nominated, and elected into office. Now days, when it comes to our contemporary national congress, both parties have spent an incredible amount of money and resources in an attempt to seize majority control in both the House and the Senate. This attempt to seize majority power in our legislative branch has led to a situation of heated competition. In fact, in recent history, we as citizens of this nation have seen our national Legislator become a partisan battle ground in which both parties and their members are seemingly polarized to an extent that the ...

TABOR and Colorado Politics Post-CC

       One of the more contentious topics within Colorado politics is budgeting and funding for projects, education, and revenue intake. This came to a head in this year's election with Proposition CC. Despite failing at the ballot box, the Democratic Party is pushing ahead with the 2020 legislative agenda that includes drafts to eliminate the Tax Payer's Bill of Rights or amend it to ensure more accessible revenue for the party's policy objectives. What is critical to the debate is the increasing partisan divide within Colorado, the historical shift from Republican control to Democrat trifectas in state government, and the institutional mechanisms that have hampered strategy for the dominant party. Also, in the mix are interest groups that influence local politics which can help uncover party strategy from another perspective.        The Colorado Fiscal Institute (CFI) a left-leaning think tank, is a key player in this battle, authoring s everal...

TABOR & Proposition CC: Providing Context to Colorado's Tax Problem

Edward Baisley Prof. Matthew Hitt POLS 304 Dec. 2019 Blog Post 3 (TABOR and Proposition CC) Colorado's tax system is very unique in comparison to pretty much every other state in the U.S. Arguably the biggest aspect of the tax system that is unique is the amendment to the Colorado Constitution known as TABOR or the Tax Payers Bill of Rights. This amendment which was drafted into law in 1992, has many implications for Colorado's state and local governments. One of the main implications is that TABOR requires the state and local governments of Colorado to acquire voter approval before any tax increase can be implemented. Some other more less known implications are detailed by Denver Post author Anna Staver, she explains that TABOR: “ Limits how many tax dollars governments can keep … It’s called the TABOR cap, anything a government collects above the cap gets returned as a TABOR tax refund … (TABOR) Limits when lawmakers can ask voters to raise taxe...