Skip to main content

Jonathan Kniss: Broken Legislature


Jonathan Kniss

Blog Post 1 Broken Legislature.

In a seemingly extremely polarized time period in our nations political history, one opinion seems to be held unanimously by Americans, and that is that congress is doing a bad job.


Macintosh HD:private:var:folders:6w:csq7mn597fn3qpwvnknbpkc00000gn:T:TemporaryItems:ucpqere8jkw3c-oj5rz5ua.png



This recently completed Gallup poll conducted this year shows the consistent disapproval of congressional representatives. After hitting its peak of 84% in 2002, the congress has experience a steep and steady decline in support of their work. even dropping to a low of 9% during President Obama’s second term in 2014.  But what exactly is contributing to this negative view of our legislature, especially in the last few years?

A major part of this issue is addressed in the article “Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion among Political Elites’ by Brookman and Skovron. The constitution states that the job of the congress is to represent the individual constituents that they represent. However, the system suffers a major hit when the legislature fails to enact policies and conduct business in a way that is not conducive to the will of their constituents. In there article Brookman and Skovron provide many statistics and proving this to be the unfortunate predicament we are finding ourselves in. The major issue they address is the legislatures inability to accurately gage the standing of their constituents. One study they used stated that “American politicians from both parties in 2012 and 2014 believed that support for conservative positions on these issues in their constituencies was much higher than it actually was” (Brookman and Skovron). It is easy to see how a politician’s incorrect view of their constituents can lead to misinformed policy initiatives. The same study goes on to find that on the issue of gun control “Politicians’ right-skewed misperceptions exceed 20 percentage points” (Brookman and Skovron).

Macintosh HD:Users:jonathankniss:Desktop:thumbnail.jpg

This table from their article shows the extent of such misperceptions of widely held American viewpoints.  All 5 of the first issues listed are considered to be liberal in their considerations.  In every case the elite perception assumed more of a conservative bias that was actually the case (Brookman and Skovron). And with respect to the prospect of more in-depth background checks for potential gun owners the estimate given by political elites was more than 35 points wrong in their estimates, unrealistically favoring the conservative viewpoint.

Jeffery Toobin in his article “Our Broken Constitution” addresses another flaw that many are worried about in our current system and that is a fundamental fracturing in the application of our constitution to a functioning legislature in 2019.  Although it is often stated with a sense of pride, the fact that the United States is utilizing the world’s oldest constitution is a statement that would have driven fear into the hearts of our founding father, including Thomas Jefferson  (Toobin). In the article  Sanford Levinson, a professor of law at the University of Texas at Austin, believes that the constitution “no longer works”. Taking this notion back to the foundation of the document he states that the constitution has “almost insurmountable barriers in the way of any acceptable notion of democracy.” (Toobin).  With political polarization and misrepresentation on the rise Levinson’s assumptions of the constitutions dysfunction in the legislature may be unfolding before our eyes.






References


BROOCKMAN, DAVID E., and CHRISTOPHER SKOVRON. “Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion among Political Elites.” American Political Science Review, vol. 112, no. 3, 2018, pp. 542–563., doi:10.1017/S0003055418000011.

Gallup, Inc. “Congress and the Public.”Gallup.com, Gallup, 12 Sept. 2019, https://news.gallup.com/poll/1600/congress-public.aspx.

Toobin, Jeffery. “Our Broken Constitution”. The New Yorker. New York, NY. December 1, 2013. Accessed on September 16, 2019 https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/12/09/our-broken-constitution





Comments

  1. Good job! With the trend of the opinion of representatives being consistently negative, it will be interesting to see if it continues to decrease over time. Representatives not being able to gauge what their constituents want makes one wonder if it is being done by accident, or if they are just more worried with the seat they have over the job itself. This seems to be a systematic issue, but also could be the fault of constituents that keep reelecting the same people they are disappointed in. It seems to be a vicious cycle that will never stop going round and round.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You did a great job on your blog post. In fact, your post helped me raise a few questions. For example, I wonder if the poor view the American Public has on Congress, has any correlation with the lack of interest in midterm elections. It is no secret that most Americans only care about the Presidential elections, and I wonder if that has anything to do with most Americans disliking Congress.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Proposition DD: Let the Bets Flow

On November 5 th , 2019, one of the two measures placed on the ballot in Colorado was Proposition DD, giving the electorate a referendum on the legality of sports betting within the state; it also would impose a tax upon the net revenue of those establishments accepting such bets, the majority of which would provide funding for the Colorado Water Plan and the remainder of which would be used to regulate sports betting and provide services for gambling addiction. Since 1992, gambling on the outcome of most sporting events had been outlawed nationally under the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, or PASPA, though with the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association , this Act was deemed unconstitutional, and state legislatures became free to legislate regarding sports betting and its legality. Proposition DD was put to a public ballot under the provisions of the TABOR amendment to the Colorado Constitution, a ‘Taxpayer Bill of Rights’ ...

The Proponents of Proposition DD

Proposition DD and its proponents One of the most significant and noteworthy results of the recent elections in Colorado was the passing of Proposition DD. A legislative proposition is a proposal placed on the ballot by the state legislature itself. The legislature in Denver referred the measure with House Bill 1327 during the spring season, with easy bipartisan support. [1] The proposition however did not receive such widespread support from the public, only narrowly passing, and being too close to call on election night. This is illustrated below. [2] The passage of Proposition DD legalised gambling on sports events, beginning in six months’ time; making Colorado the nineteenth state to legalise sports betting. Colorado’s seventeen casino operators will be eligible to apply for licenses for both physical and online sportsbooks, with the Colorado Division of Gaming being tasked to regulate the market. [3] ‘Yes on Proposition DD’ raised about $2.83 million for ca...

Immigration Visas and Polarization

Megan King  The story I decided to investigate in National News is , “ Federal Judges Block Trump Policy Targeting Legal Immigrants on Public Benefits ” by Claire Hansen demonstrates how difficult the policymaking procedure can be. In regard to the separations of powers, this ideology does give each branch equal representation, which in this case was to block a new policy. In this situation, three judges filed lawsuits because the new policy the Government was going to implement that visas could be denied if they think that immigrants who are going to use public benefits. It is known as the “public charge” policy which is basically, “any individual who is deemed likely to accept a benefit is considered a public charger” which was just another attempt from the Trump Administration desiring to stop immigration (Hansen). There has already been policies in place that set up circumstances that Immigration Courts and the Government have set up to deny immigration residence just in...