Skip to main content

Healthcare: Medicare-for-all and the 2020 Election

In the 2018 midterm election, the American people went out to the polls in record numbers. Their main issue? Healthcare.

In 2010, the Affordable Care Act was passed, two years into the Obama Administration. After years of negotiations on Capitol Hill, the ACA would still prove to be a point of contention in the elections that would follow. In 2016, Republican lawmakers launched an ultimately unsuccessful effort to repeal Obamacare. This effort joins more than fifty other attempts to repeal the ACA as a failure (Berenson, 2017).

Despite their many failures, in December of 2017, Republicans earned a key victory in their crusade to end the abuses of Obamacare when President Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 into law (CBO, 2017). This law ended the individual mandate, a key provision of the ACA. The individual mandate required that all individuals obtain health insurance or face a penalty. Without this mandate, the ACA essentially became ineffective.

In 2018, healthcare was once again a key issue. In fact, according to the Pew Research Center, as many as 75% of voters in the 2018 midterm election said that healthcare was a "very important" issue. This proved significant as, after the midterms, the House of Representatives was flipped from Republican control to a Democratic majority.

With the 2020 election around the corner, healthcare becomes a prevalent issue once again. Many Democratic candidates favor more progressive policy, including Medicare-for-all. In fact, in 2016, Bernie Sanders was one of the major voices calling for Medicare-for-all. Now, however, he joins many other progressive Democrats in calling for Medicare-for-all. In 2018, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez won a race in New York on a progressive, Democratic socialist platform. Now, she is one of the most prevalent voices in Congress calling for Medicare-for-all.

As 2020 looms ever-closer, the issue of healthcare becomes more and more significant. Will voters once again come out in droves to rebuke the Republican Party's stance on healthcare? Until then, anything can happen.





Sources:

Geiger, A. W. (2018, November 1). The 2018 midterms: What matters to voters? Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/11/01/a-look-at-voters-views-ahead-of-the-2018-midterms/

Reconciliation Recommendations of the Senate Committee on Finance. (2017, November 27). Retrieved from https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53348

Scott, D. (2018, April 13). A requiem for the individual mandate. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/4/13/17226566/obamacare-penalty-2018-individual-mandate-still-in-effect

Geiger, A. W. (2018, November 1). The 2018 midterms: What matters to voters? Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/11/01/a-look-at-voters-views-ahead-of-the-2018-midterms/
Reconciliation Recommendations of the Senate Committee on Finance. (2017, November 27). Retrieved from https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53348
Scott, D. (2018, April 13). A requiem for the individual mandate. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/4/13/17226566/obamacare-penalty-2018-individual-mandate-still-in-effect
Geiger, A. W. (2018, November 1). The 2018 midterms: What matters to voters? Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/11/01/a-look-at-voters-views-ahead-of-the-2018-midterms/
Reconciliation Recommendations of the Senate Committee on Finance. (2017, November 27). Retrieved from https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53348
Scott, D. (2018, April 13). A requiem for the individual mandate. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/4/13/17226566/obamacare-penalty-2018-individual-mandate-still-in-effect

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gun Control in Colorado

Due to the prevalence of mass shootings in the United States, many states have adapted gun legislation to target the issue. Colorado is no exception. The House Bill 1177 or more commonly known as “the red flag bill” was passed this previous legislative session (Aguilar). The bill allows the court to seize firearms from individuals who are deemed a threat to themselves or to others (Aguilar). This considerable gun legislation is significant for Democrats who have advocated for gun control for years. More importantly, the passing of this bill may once again demonstrate which party has been gaining momentum in Colorado these past few years. Colorado’s legislature has generally sided to the left in recent times (Strayer 141). This is a significant shift from the more Republican leaning legislature that Colorado was previously used to (Strayer 141). Furthermore, Colorado’s House Bill 1177 is in no way addressing the issue in a very unique way. Figure 1 below demonstrates nationwide...

Insulin cap in Colorado

In the United States, the topic of medication prices has increased substantially, specifically insulin. Insulin is a medication used to treat type one Diabetes which typically costs a thousand dollars or more depending on how much you need, and how much your insurance is willing to pay. Colorado changed this with a bill designed to put a cap on the copay for insulin. The bill HB19-1216 was signed into law by Governor Jared Polis in May of 2019. This bill states that “a carrier that provides coverage for prescription insulin drugs pursuant to the terms of a health coverage plan the carrier offers shall cap the total amount that a covered person is required to pay for a covered prescription insulin drug at an amount not to exceed one hundred dollars per thirty-day supply of insulin, regardless of the amount of type of insulin needed to fill the covered person’s prescription.” This bill will go into effect on January 1st, 2020 and will be overseen by the department of law who will investi...

TABOR and Colorado Politics Post-CC

       One of the more contentious topics within Colorado politics is budgeting and funding for projects, education, and revenue intake. This came to a head in this year's election with Proposition CC. Despite failing at the ballot box, the Democratic Party is pushing ahead with the 2020 legislative agenda that includes drafts to eliminate the Tax Payer's Bill of Rights or amend it to ensure more accessible revenue for the party's policy objectives. What is critical to the debate is the increasing partisan divide within Colorado, the historical shift from Republican control to Democrat trifectas in state government, and the institutional mechanisms that have hampered strategy for the dominant party. Also, in the mix are interest groups that influence local politics which can help uncover party strategy from another perspective.        The Colorado Fiscal Institute (CFI) a left-leaning think tank, is a key player in this battle, authoring s everal...