Skip to main content

Healthcare: Medicare-for-all and the 2020 Election

In the 2018 midterm election, the American people went out to the polls in record numbers. Their main issue? Healthcare.

In 2010, the Affordable Care Act was passed, two years into the Obama Administration. After years of negotiations on Capitol Hill, the ACA would still prove to be a point of contention in the elections that would follow. In 2016, Republican lawmakers launched an ultimately unsuccessful effort to repeal Obamacare. This effort joins more than fifty other attempts to repeal the ACA as a failure (Berenson, 2017).

Despite their many failures, in December of 2017, Republicans earned a key victory in their crusade to end the abuses of Obamacare when President Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 into law (CBO, 2017). This law ended the individual mandate, a key provision of the ACA. The individual mandate required that all individuals obtain health insurance or face a penalty. Without this mandate, the ACA essentially became ineffective.

In 2018, healthcare was once again a key issue. In fact, according to the Pew Research Center, as many as 75% of voters in the 2018 midterm election said that healthcare was a "very important" issue. This proved significant as, after the midterms, the House of Representatives was flipped from Republican control to a Democratic majority.

With the 2020 election around the corner, healthcare becomes a prevalent issue once again. Many Democratic candidates favor more progressive policy, including Medicare-for-all. In fact, in 2016, Bernie Sanders was one of the major voices calling for Medicare-for-all. Now, however, he joins many other progressive Democrats in calling for Medicare-for-all. In 2018, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez won a race in New York on a progressive, Democratic socialist platform. Now, she is one of the most prevalent voices in Congress calling for Medicare-for-all.

As 2020 looms ever-closer, the issue of healthcare becomes more and more significant. Will voters once again come out in droves to rebuke the Republican Party's stance on healthcare? Until then, anything can happen.





Sources:

Geiger, A. W. (2018, November 1). The 2018 midterms: What matters to voters? Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/11/01/a-look-at-voters-views-ahead-of-the-2018-midterms/

Reconciliation Recommendations of the Senate Committee on Finance. (2017, November 27). Retrieved from https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53348

Scott, D. (2018, April 13). A requiem for the individual mandate. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/4/13/17226566/obamacare-penalty-2018-individual-mandate-still-in-effect

Geiger, A. W. (2018, November 1). The 2018 midterms: What matters to voters? Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/11/01/a-look-at-voters-views-ahead-of-the-2018-midterms/
Reconciliation Recommendations of the Senate Committee on Finance. (2017, November 27). Retrieved from https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53348
Scott, D. (2018, April 13). A requiem for the individual mandate. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/4/13/17226566/obamacare-penalty-2018-individual-mandate-still-in-effect
Geiger, A. W. (2018, November 1). The 2018 midterms: What matters to voters? Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/11/01/a-look-at-voters-views-ahead-of-the-2018-midterms/
Reconciliation Recommendations of the Senate Committee on Finance. (2017, November 27). Retrieved from https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53348
Scott, D. (2018, April 13). A requiem for the individual mandate. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/4/13/17226566/obamacare-penalty-2018-individual-mandate-still-in-effect

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Colorado Legislation and Arms Limitations

The Columbine High School shooting that took place in 1999 claimed the lives of 15 people and wounded 28. Since then the topic of gun control has sparked debates supporting both sides of the argument and from state to state the laws of carrying differs. As of now, a very brief summary of Colorado state law concerning personal arm restrictions are: "Colorado law also allows a person to possess a handgun in a dwelling, place of business, or automobile. However, when you carry the weapon into your home, business, hotel room, etc. it must be in plain view" (colorado.gov). And according to the National Rifle Association for Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA), in Colorado, there is no Permit to Purchase required for a rifle, shotgun or handgun. There is no required Registration of Firearms for rifles, shotguns or handguns. There is no Licensing of Owner for rifles, shotguns or handguns, and there is no permit to carry rifles or shotguns, however, a permit to carry is requi...

Proposition DD: Let the Bets Flow

On November 5 th , 2019, one of the two measures placed on the ballot in Colorado was Proposition DD, giving the electorate a referendum on the legality of sports betting within the state; it also would impose a tax upon the net revenue of those establishments accepting such bets, the majority of which would provide funding for the Colorado Water Plan and the remainder of which would be used to regulate sports betting and provide services for gambling addiction. Since 1992, gambling on the outcome of most sporting events had been outlawed nationally under the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, or PASPA, though with the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association , this Act was deemed unconstitutional, and state legislatures became free to legislate regarding sports betting and its legality. Proposition DD was put to a public ballot under the provisions of the TABOR amendment to the Colorado Constitution, a ‘Taxpayer Bill of Rights’ ...

The Proponents of Proposition DD

Proposition DD and its proponents One of the most significant and noteworthy results of the recent elections in Colorado was the passing of Proposition DD. A legislative proposition is a proposal placed on the ballot by the state legislature itself. The legislature in Denver referred the measure with House Bill 1327 during the spring season, with easy bipartisan support. [1] The proposition however did not receive such widespread support from the public, only narrowly passing, and being too close to call on election night. This is illustrated below. [2] The passage of Proposition DD legalised gambling on sports events, beginning in six months’ time; making Colorado the nineteenth state to legalise sports betting. Colorado’s seventeen casino operators will be eligible to apply for licenses for both physical and online sportsbooks, with the Colorado Division of Gaming being tasked to regulate the market. [3] ‘Yes on Proposition DD’ raised about $2.83 million for ca...